Repository
Search
Policy Area
Format
Country/Region
Year
Research Project
Research Type
Author
-
Working Papers
New Mexico’s Economy Over Time and Space
This report examines New Mexico’s economy over more than a century to inform statewide and regional economic development efforts. By mapping both long-term trajectories and recent changes, the analysis is […]
This report examines New Mexico’s economy over more than a century to inform statewide and regional economic development efforts. By mapping both long-term trajectories and recent changes, the analysis is designed to support effective strategies for state and local leaders as they seek to address persistent challenges, respond to new risks, and leverage unique opportunities across the state’s diverse economies.
Long-Term Perspective (1900–2020)
The first section of this report provides an overview of New Mexico’s longer-term growth path to understand how the past influences the present and future of the state economy. New Mexico’s population never accelerated like some of its neighbors and peers. Slowdowns and uneven growth meant that New Mexico never attracted people in the way that Arizona, Colorado, or Utah did. Recent population growth has been the slowest in the last 120 years for New Mexico, indicating important economic problems that have made people “vote with their feet” to leave the state. Population growth and migration patterns are always co-evolving with what is happening in the state economy. Early in the 20th century, New Mexico’s economy was centered on agriculture, and over the next century, New Mexico saw a uniquely precipitous drop in employment in this sector. New Mexico missed early waves of manufacturing-led industrialization that benefited other states. This likely indicates a limit on how much manufacturing growth is possible moving forward, as the state has fewer latent capabilities and assets than other states that historically had larger manufacturing sectors. Mining, including the extraction of oil and gas, grew to be a critical part of the New Mexican economy and government revenues, but never accounted for more than 10% of jobs. Government activity also grew to be a uniquely large part of the state economy in New Mexico because of both state and federal funding.
Beneath the long-term statewide trends, New Mexico’s economy is striking for the variation of economic performance and drivers across the state. From a long-term perspective, many rural areas are still responding to major economic shocks to their sources of tradable income that often happened many decades ago. In an ideal world, major urban hubs would absorb the outmigration from regions that are losing population. However, as rural communities navigate these challenges, urban areas have not been in a strong enough position to absorb displaced populations from other parts of the state or in-migration from other states. As the state economy has evolved from industries that are rooted in place (such as agriculture and mining) to industries that thrive in more urban settings (such as professional services), the weaknesses of urban economies in New Mexico in comparison to other states stand out.
Medium and Short-Term Perspective (1997-2024)
Several of the challenges of New Mexico over the long-term have continued to play out over the last 25 years. New Mexico’s per capita growth has been relatively low, and its income level has fallen further behind other states, especially within the region. The period of 2005-17 was exceptionally weak, marked by several years of per capita contraction that cannot be explained by national patterns. Arguably, the most important problem over 2005-17 was that state and local government activity followed a procyclical pattern that made the downturn worse when fiscal policy could have been designed to partially offset the pain of the downturn. The decline in the state government activity appears to be driven by a significant drop in tax collection that was only partially cushioned by increased federal spending at the time. While New Mexico is now enjoying a period of more robust growth, an economic upswing since 2018 has yet to offset the effects of a prolonged stagnation. Past dynamics suggest that today’s “boom” in growth will likely be followed by a period of “bust”. Whether the current higher growth trajectory should be expected to continue hinges on the sustainability of current growth drivers and the potential for others to emerge.
Again, beneath these state patterns, there is significant variation in economic performance across New Mexico’s regions. A few urban counties, most of all Bernalillo County, drive the state’s overall economic activity, and their growth has lagged national trends. Counties across the state have growth patterns that are largely uncorrelated with each other. One can see the effects of state-level downturns across many counties, but state growth does not translate equally in all counties. In fact, some counties have grown in a negatively correlated way with statewide growth over the last 25 years. Depending on their local economic drivers, some counties are currently growing rapidly — for example, Lea and Eddy counties, which benefit directly from current oil and gas expansion in the Permian Basin. Several rural counties have seen growth, driven by different sectors in recent years, even as they face long-term pressures. Meanwhile, several urban economies are struggling to absorb population and labor. A deep dive into Albuquerque’s growth finds that an undersupply of housing is the most binding constraint today.
Implications for Economic Strategy and Policy
New Mexico is building on several strengths in its economic development strategy. Recent successes, including major business investments in Albuquerque and Las Cruces and the expansion of universal childcare and tuition-free college, mark important steps forward. The state has channeled a great part of its oil and gas windfalls into permanent funds, ensuring increased reserves for use in education, early childhood, and future flexibility. Annual distributions from these reserves now account for major shares of education spending, and they are projected to become an even larger part of the state budget. New Mexico has also had some success in targeting sectors for investment attraction and in a public push in site development and site readiness for investment. The state also faces new and recurring stressors, and this report has several implications for strategy moving forward. As federal funds recede, the state’s reserves are increasingly needed to offset cuts in healthcare, higher education, and other urgent areas, narrowing available fiscal space for new priorities. New Mexico has improved its ability to save revenues generated during the current resource boom, but it will also have to navigate spending tradeoffs. We suggest more deployment of the state’s fiscal resources to expand regional capacity to attract investment and actions to better address housing supply constraints in urban areas — both of which are small budget items in relation to existing priorities but with large potential gains. While New Mexico is moving in the right direction by targeting sectors and identifying key sites for development, the diversity of regional challenges and opportunities calls for greater regional tailoring. County-by-county analyses of diversification opportunities, using economic complexity methods, are available in this online repository. As for addressing labor supply constraints, investments in childcare and higher education effectively target long-term pressures on talent retention and attraction. However, the principal obstacle remains housing. There are state and local actions that can be taken to allow housing supply to better meet growing demand.
-
Working Papers
Women at Work: A Systematic Diagnostic of Female Saudi Employment Gains in Saudi Arabia
Saudi Arabia has witnessed a paradox where high demand for labor did not translate into high labor force participation for Saudi women. Despite possessing higher educational attainment than men, Saudi […]Saudi Arabia has witnessed a paradox where high demand for labor did not translate into high labor force participation for Saudi women. Despite possessing higher educational attainment than men, Saudi women historically faced lower participation rates, higher unemployment, and concentration in lower-paying sectors. This paper examines the paradoxical surge in Saudi women’s employment during a period of economic weakness following the 2014 oil price shock and 2020 pandemic. The study documents unprecedented employment gains driven primarily by new labor market entrants, particularly women with high school education or less, who diversified beyond traditional education and health sectors into retail, construction, manufacturing, and food services. Through empirical analysis of policy reforms implemented between 2016-2022, the paper identifies three key drivers of Saudi women’s employment gains: the removal of legal and social barriers (including workspace requirements and driving restrictions), wage subsidies during COVID-19, and increases in the Nitaqat de facto minimum wage for Saudi workers. While these gains represent historic progress, the analysis reveals concerning trends, including a widening gender wage gap and questions regarding the sustainability of subsidy-dependent employment growth. The paper highlights the need to balance short-term policy interventions to increase women’s entry into the workforce with long-term diversification efforts that align women’s skills and wage expectations with market demands to ensure sustainable and equitable employment outcomes.
-
Working Papers
Growth Through Diversification in Hermosillo
In this report, we study Hermosillo’s economic performance and assess critical issues affecting the city’s ability to achieve stronger economic growth. Although Hermosillo is far from experiencing economic stagnation, it […]In this report, we study Hermosillo’s economic performance and assess critical issues affecting the city’s ability to achieve stronger economic growth. Although Hermosillo is far from experiencing economic stagnation, it fell behind other cities that managed to become successful economic hubs between 2010 and 2020. The main reason behind this trailing growth is Hermosillo’s relatively low diversification and investment dynamics, especially in the manufacturing sector. We apply growth diagnostic testing on various potential constraints to economic growth: logistics, electricity, water, human capital, housing, and transportation. Although none of them have directly constrained economic growth in the past, some are explicit threats to increasing growth in the future, thus catching up with high-performing peers. Electricity, human capital, and logistics are comparative advantages, while water, housing, and transportation are threats.
In 2025, Mexico is expected to start a new period in its economic history marked by the promise of nearshoring and a new presidential administration. In the past, Mexico has gone through milestones that heavily impacted its economic development path, like the establishment of NAFTA and the China Shock (Hanson, 2010). The rise of Northern Mexico and other regions like El Bajío as global manufacturing hubs has resulted from greater integration with the North American market. This has brought foreign direct investments (FDI) targeted at establishing manufacturing sites primarily to cater to US demand and exports to the rest of the world. Mexico holds high expectations that nearshoring will bring opportunities of the same or greater magnitude. In that context, Hermosillo stands out as a city with the potential to exploit those opportunities and enhance its economic transformation. It is crucial to analyze its binding constraints for economic growth, comparative advantages, and potential concerns to understand how well-positioned Hermosillo is to take advantage of this momentum.
Following the introduction and a methodological overview, the report is divided into four main sections. Section 3 provides a growth perspective on Hermosillo; Section 4 presents an analysis of growth constraints; Section 5 explains the local diversification challenge in detail; and Section 6 describes strategic policy areas to accelerate growth that result from this growth diagnostic analysis.
-
Working Papers
How Wyoming’s Exodus of Young Adults Holds Back Economic Diversification
A missing ingredient to Wyoming’s diversification efforts is keeping young people and families in the state. By the time people born in Wyoming reach their thirties, nearly two thirds have left – one of the highest rates in the country. Without access to this workforce, it is exceedingly difficult for the Wyoming economy to diversify.Wyoming is a rural Mountain West state with a high Gross State Product (GSP) per capita, foremostly driven by its fossil fuel sector. The state’s longstanding strengths in resource extraction provide much of its livelihood, including both its private earnings and public finances. Its other industries are comparatively much smaller, but Wyoming would benefit from their expansion in order to smooth out resource-related shocks going forward. Importantly, Wyoming should think on a big scale when considering such opportunities. Middling, business-as-usual growth in its non-resource sectors will not fundamentally do much to insulate Wyoming’s economy against resource busts. One category of diversification opportunities to consider are those in industries tied to the natural endowments of the land. Wyoming generally does well in these sectors, but prospects of further expansion are either highly uncertain or limited in scale. Some of the most promising opportunities are in new energy and critical minerals, but these carry significant technological uncertainty and/or modest income potential. Transformative growth in agriculture is likely to be difficult because Wyoming faces hard constraints on its water consumption, and its tourism income per capita is already among the very highest of any US states. Adding value to raw materials is a commonly-discussed strategy that, in practice, does not work well in the modern economy because raw materials are often easily traded over long distances. While it is therefore vital for Wyoming to pursue economic activities related to its natural endowments, it must also look to its advanced services and manufacturing sectors. Wyoming is a severe laggard in these industries versus other states, and serious action is needed to generate the large pools of skilled labor that they need to succeed. There is widespread recognition that Wyoming is behind on this matter, and the state has made critical investments in education to bridge this gap. The missing ingredient, however, is keeping young people and families in the state. By the time people born in Wyoming reach their thirties, nearly two thirds have left – one of the highest rates in the country. Without access to this workforce, it is exceedingly difficult for the Wyoming economy to diversify. Empirically, young Wyomingites and families overwhelmingly leave the state in favor of larger cities. University of Wyoming graduates especially are attracted to large cities a few hours’ drive away from Laramie, Wyoming (where the University of Wyoming is located). These destinations include Fort Collins and Denver. Even if it wanted to, Wyoming could not wave a magic wand to create a large urban metropolis overnight, and it is therefore necessary to understand what specifically attracts young adults and families to these big cities instead of Wyoming towns so that the latter can compete better. The evidence shows that housing is a surprisingly important factor related to migration decisions on which Wyoming underperforms. Young adults fresh out of university often prefer to live in centrally-located apartments, so that they are close to jobs, restaurants, and friends. Wyoming towns, however, lack dense multi-family housing in their downtown cores as compared to other US towns with very similar overall population. This lack of dense downtown housing suitable for young people contributes to an overall housing supply deficiency, thereby driving up housing prices across the board. It also entails depressed foot traffic in downtowns, leading to fewer customers for local businesses and ultimately fewer urban amenities like restaurants versus Colorado communities – a key result given that surveyed University of Wyoming students report that restaurants are their top desired urban amenity. The main reason there is not denser housing in Wyoming downtowns is because strict regulations have illegalized them. A plethora of restrictions exist around issues like minimum lot sizes, maximum building heights, minimum parking space requirements, maximum dwellings per unit of area, and more. Studies show that Wyoming is more overregulated than other communities when it comes to restrictions on housing density. Other places successfully leave these decisions to the free market rather than government, and Wyoming could remove these restrictions to increase its supply of housing for young people at no cost. There is additionally a lack of funding for arterial infrastructure in Wyoming, such as water and sewage lines, which drives up development costs. A general lack of funding for community assets arguably also affects young peoples’ and families’ migration decisions. There is evidence that community demand for investment outstrips supply in water and transport infrastructure, and that many counties use allotted sales tax expansions (“Penny Taxes”) very frequently. One way Wyoming could direct more funding to its local communities is via an expanded grants management system; Wyoming gets less federal grant funding per person than other rural US states, and based on interviews this is tied to a lack of dedicated staff who can navigate the significant overhead associated with following and applying for grants. Overall, while Wyoming is currently a laggard on advanced service and manufacturing industries there are concrete steps it could take to compete better by retaining more of its young people. Wyoming’s Pathways to Prosperity economic development project has already enacted a number of changes to support that outcome, but more can be done. With denser downtowns and more funding for community assets, Wyoming would bolster both its economic and cultural vitality by keeping its young people and leveraging them to obtain growth in new industries. Related project: Pathways to Prosperity in Wyoming -
Working Papers
Growth Through Inclusion in South Africa
It is painfully clear that South Africa is performing poorly, exacerbating problems such as inequality and exclusion. The economy’s ability to create jobs is slowing, worsening South Africa’s extreme levels […]It is painfully clear that South Africa is performing poorly, exacerbating problems such as inequality and exclusion. The economy’s ability to create jobs is slowing, worsening South Africa’s extreme levels of unemployment and inequality. South Africans are deeply disappointed with social progress and dislike the direction where the country seems to be heading. Despite its enviable productive capabilities, the national economy is losing international competitiveness. As the economy staggers, South Africa faces deteriorating social indicators and declining levels of public satisfaction with the status quo. After 15 years, attempts to stimulate the economy through fiscal policy and to address exclusion through social grants have failed to achieve their goals. Instead, they have sacrificed the country’s investment grade, increasing the cost of capital to the whole economy, with little social progress to show for it. The underlying capabilities to achieve sustained growth by leveraging the full capability of its people, companies, assets, and knowhow remain underutilized. Three decades after the end of apartheid, the economy is defined by stagnation and exclusion, and current strategies are not achieving inclusion and empowerment in practice.
This report asks the question of why. Why is the economy growing far slower than any reasonable comparator countries? Why is exclusion so extraordinarily high, even after decades of various policies that have aimed to support socio-economic transformation? What would it take for South Africa to include more of its people, capabilities, assets, and ideas in the functioning of the economy, and why aren’t such actions being undertaken already? The Growth Lab has completed a deep diagnostic of potential causes of South Africa’s prolonged underperformance over a two-year research project. Building on the findings of nine papers and widespread collaboration with government, academics, business and NGOs, this report documents the project’s central findings. Bluntly speaking, the report finds that South Africa is not accomplishing its goals of inclusion, empowerment and transformation, and new strategies and instruments will be needed to do so. We found two broad classes of problems that undermine inclusive growth in the Rainbow Nation: collapsing state capacity and spatial exclusion.
Learn more about the Growth Lab’s research engagement, Growth Through Inclusion in South Africa.
-
Working Papers
Food for Growth: A Diagnostics of Namibia’s Agriculture Sector
This growth diagnostic report analyzes the economic constraints that explain the underperformance of the agriculture sector in Namibia. Section 1 starts by showing why Namibia’s agricultural challenge is unique when […]This growth diagnostic report analyzes the economic constraints that explain the underperformance of the agriculture sector in Namibia. Section 1 starts by showing why Namibia’s agricultural challenge is unique when compared to the rest of the world. We then describe the sector’s key features, recent trajectory, and growth potential across different relevant dimensions in Section 2. In Section 3, we provide an adaptation of the growth diagnostic framework to the case of agriculture in Namibia and a detailed analysis of its economic constraints. Finally, Section 4 presents policy guidelines for addressing the challenges described in this report and prioritizing policy interventions accordingly.
-
Working Papers
Growth Diagnostics and Competitiveness Study of the Manufacturing Sector in Tanzania
Tanzania’s manufacturing puzzles (and frustrations) seem to be a natural outcome of their policy choice. The Tanzanian economy experienced a significant acceleration over two decades, growing at a compounded annual […]Tanzania’s manufacturing puzzles (and frustrations) seem to be a natural outcome of their policy choice. The Tanzanian economy experienced a significant acceleration over two decades, growing at a compounded annual growth rate of 6% between 1998 and 2018: Largest rates were recorded and sustained by the super commodity cycle (2005-2014). Within that growth trajectory, manufacturing’s share of gross domestic product (GDP) has lingered for 30 years below 10% – well below the 23% target established for 2025 in Tanzania’s Industrial Development Strategy (2011). As stressed by Diao et al (2021), the bulk of manufacturing value added is created by a few capital-intensive firms, whereas informal manufacturing has increased employment but without significant improvements in productivity/wages. Manufacturing exports surged in 2011 and remained steady since driven by subsector basic metals (gold & unrefined copper). If these are excluded, the curve mirrors the commodity price boom (likely a price boom rather than a volume boom). Looking only at exports conceals the fact that the bulk of the manufacturing output in Tanzania is sold in the domestic market rather than exported: exports are equivalent to less than 2% of GDP; domestic sales are seven times higher. While Food and Beverages make up for the largest share of manufacturing value employment and value-added, basic metals are the ones accounting for the vast majority of Tanzania’s exports.
The most binding constraint to investments in manufacturing in Tanzania is the availability and quality of electricity supply: Access to electricity is the lowest among peers, with large disparities between rural (22%) and urban (70%). Electrical outages are frequent and expensive for the manufacturing sector; firms even plan their production schedules and decide on plant locations based on power reliability. And yet, when we analyze the share of value-added against energy intensity at the sub-sector level, the negative relationship to be expected if electricity is indeed the constraint is there, but too fragile and noisy. Why? The strongest evidence points to the role of trade protection in compensating firms for other constraints, allowing existing manufacturers to capture large shares of domestic value-added while remaining uncompetitive in export markets. Large manufacturing subsectors of moderate to high energy intensity and more capital intensive enjoy higher tariff protection, creating a wedge that allows these industries to thrive in the domestic market. Despite joining numerous free trade agreements, Tanzania remains one of the most restrictive countries from a trade standpoint, eased by filing exceptions that shield individual products and entire domestic industries from competition. We have also found that effective taxation in Tanzania is relatively higher on labor (lower on capital, materialized through massive tax holidays granted within SEZ), skewing returns away from the country’s relative labor abundance. Failure to address the binding constraints creates a rationale for upholding protection, which reinforces biases towards capital and energy-intensive sectors. These policies go a long way in explaining the Tanzanian manufacturing puzzle.
-
Reports
Economic Growth and Complexity in the UAE: Summary Report
This document summarizes high-level findings on the United Arab Emirates’ (UAE) growth trajectory, economic diversification record, and future prospects. It is based on the work carried out as part of […]This document summarizes high-level findings on the United Arab Emirates’ (UAE) growth trajectory, economic diversification record, and future prospects. It is based on the work carried out as part of an ongoing collaboration between Harvard’s Growth Lab and the UAE Ministry of Economy (MoE). This collaboration aims to produce novel research-based inputs to inform an ambitious, forward-looking economic policy agenda. Over the last year, it has entailed research on various topics. These have included documenting the country’s past growth path and potential for the future, understanding UAE’s short-run macroeconomic and inflation dynamics, studying trade patterns and free-trade agreements, and looking into labor markets and productivity dynamics.
This document provides a summary of some of the research stemming from the first phase of work, drawing especially on two reports: Elements of a Growth Diagnostic: The United Arab Emirates (Brenot et al, unpublished) and Economic Complexity: The United Arab Emirates (Tapia et al, 2023). These two reports together lay out research on the UAE’s growth model over the last two decades and use an “economic complexity” lens to analyze where future sources of diversification and growth might come from. The Elements of a Growth Diagnostic report mainly focuses on the past. It examines the UAE’s growth performance between 2000 and 2019 (prior to the COVID-19 pandemic) to understand the drivers of the UAE’s growth model and document the changes in the UAE economy during this time. Economic Complexity: The United Arab Emirates looks at the performance of the UAE’s exports and industrial diversification using a “knowhow” and complexity lens, pioneered by Hidalgo & Hausmann (2009), and also suggests high-potential activities for further diversification.
As part of a broader research agenda, this summary document is meant as a companion piece to more than a year of past research, but also as a starting point for the next phase of collaboration between the Growth Lab and the MoE. In addition to this summary document and the reports it draws on, there is also a companion Inputs for Policy Design – Tools for Economic Diversification report. The report makes a more policy-oriented contribution, discussing more in-depth three concrete tools to achieve further economic diversification: foreign direct investment (FDI), Free Zones, and Sovereign Wealth Funds (SWFs).
This summary document highlights the key themes and insights gathered during this past year, while also laying out a set of questions for future research. The rest of this document is structured as follows. Section 2 summarizes key themes of the UAE’s past growth performance and its key drivers at an aggregate, national level. Section 3 goes deeper to describe the current state of the UAE economy by geography and sector, and documents the way the economy has already begun to diversify into non-oil activities. Section 4 further examines the UAE’s diversification path using a complexity approach to better shed light on the UAE’s future diversification prospects. Finally, Section 5 concludes with a set of key takeaways and themes for further research.
-
Working Papers
The Connectivity Trap: Stuck between the Forest and Shared Prosperity in the Colombian Amazon
The Colombian Amazon faces the dual challenge of low economic growth and high deforestation. High rates of deforestation in Colombia have led to a perceived trade-off between economic development and […] -
Working Papers
La trampa de conectividad: cómo la Amazonía colombiana está atrapada entre la selva y la prosperidad compartida
La Amazonía colombiana enfrenta un desafío doble: bajo crecimiento económico y alta deforestación. Las altas tasas de deforestación en Colombia han llevado a que se crea que el desarrollo económico […]La Amazonía colombiana enfrenta un desafío doble: bajo crecimiento económico y alta deforestación. Las altas tasas de deforestación en Colombia han llevado a que se crea que el desarrollo económico no puede tener lugar si se protege la selva. Nosotros no encontramos evidencia que sustente esa dicotomía: el aumento de la deforestación no está asociado a un mayor crecimiento económico. Las fuerzas detrás de la deforestación de una de las áreas con mayor biodiversidad en el planeta se sustentan en algunas de las actividades económicas menos complejas, como la ganadería extensiva, cuyos ingresos son incapaces de cumplir con las ambiciones económicas de la región. Al mismo tiempo, la mayoría de la población de los departamentos amazónicos trabaja en ciudades y pueblos desprovistos de selva, lejos de la frontera agropecuaria que forma el “arco de deforestación”. La relativa urbanización de los departamentos amazónicos, pese a la gran masa de tierra disponible, constituye un reconocimiento de que la prosperidad solo se logra mediante interacciones socioeconómicas que expanden el conjunto de conocimientos disponible para que se pueda producir más, y mediante actividades más complejas. Por lo tanto, para alcanzar las metas económicas hay que crear nuevas oportunidades productivas en las áreas urbanas sin selva.
El riesgo de deforestación reduce los incentivos para mejorar la conectividad de los departamentos amazónicos con las grandes ciudades y los mercados de exportación. El carácter remoto de estos departamentos aumenta el costo de “exportar” bienes a mercados que están fuera de estos departamentos. La conectividad precaria de la región contribuye a su baja complejidad económica, que a su vez reduce los incentivos para coordinar nuevas inversiones que podrían generar retornos a partir de una mayor conectividad. Las fallas de coordinación – que ocurren cuando un grupo de actores económicos (como empresas y trabajadores) podrían lograr un mejor resultado, pero no logran hacerlo pues no coordinan sus acciones respectivas – son extendidas en los tres departamentos amazónicos bajo estudio. Esto limita la creación de nuevas capacidades y la diversificación productiva que podrían generar nuevos empleos y mayores ingresos.
Planteamos que el crecimiento económico en la Amazonía colombiana está siendo limitado por una “trampa de conectividad” donde la falta de conectividad con los mercados externos restringe la complejidad económica, y a su vez la baja complejidad alienta las fallas de coordinación que limitan los retornos de una nueva diversificación. A fin de cuentas, los bajos retornos de la diversificación reducen aún más los incentivos para mejorar la conectividad. Como trasfondo de la trampa de conectividad está la creencia de que limitar la conectividad de los departamentos amazónicos con las grandes ciudades colombianas y el resto de la economía global limitará también los incentivos para la deforestación. Pero la deforestación se ha acelerado en los últimos años, mientras que la conectividad sigue siendo muy mala. Nosotros argumentamos que Colombia debe crear una nueva ley nacional para frenar la deforestación que elimine los incentivos financieros de la especulación con tierras, al reclasificar las áreas selváticas bajo control de los sistemas nacionales de protección para que tengan severas restricciones sobre las actividades que se puedan emprender en ellas, y se refuercen las labores de cumplimiento de la ley, como se comenta en detalle en el reporte siguiente. Con una ley que elimine los incentivos para la deforestación, el gobierno nacional debe crear un nuevo enfoque del desarrollo para la Amazonía colombiana. Este enfoque debe trascender el basado en los recursos naturales y centrarse en el potencial productivo de las áreas urbanas, así como en los mercados de carbono y el potencial turístico de las áreas selváticas. Un pilar de este enfoque es la construcción de nuevas capacidades en el sector público, que le permitan coordinar inversiones en nuevos sectores productivos específicos, para crear nuevos mecanismos locales y nacionales de promoción de inversiones. Un segundo pilar es la mejora de la conectividad con los mercados externos, mediante inversiones en carreteras y transporte aéreo entre Caquetá, Guaviare y Putumayo, y las grandes ciudades y los puertos.