Export-led Growth
Should exports be an important focus of economic growth strategies? The Washington Consensus, summarised by John Williamson some 35 years ago, would have answered in the negative. In the 1980s, when the consensus was forged, many countries had highly protective trade regimes, multiple exchange rates with large black-market premia, interest rate controls, and high inflation. The consensus was that if countries unified exchange rates, reduced barriers to trade, and brought inflation under control, exports would follow naturally. According to the Lerner symmetry theorem, import tariffs are equivalent to a tax on exports. Exchange controls act as an additional tax by forcing exporters to sell their earnings at an artificially appreciated exchange rate. If such policy-induced distortions were eliminated, the Washington Consensus suggested, exports would naturally reach their efficient level.
Today, many countries have unified their exchange rates, eliminated exchange controls, brought inflation to single digits, reduced trade barriers, and signed free trade agreements with many of their main trade partners, and yet, the median country has not narrowed its income gap with the United States. Export performance matters for growth, with countries that grow exhibiting more than proportional export growth. In many developing and emerging economies, growth is highly correlated with exogenous movements in their export prices and on fluctuations in international capital flows. Moreover, sustained fast-growing economies change the composition of their export basket substantially towards new, more complex products.
Regional differences in growth and export trajectories confirm these observations. Countries in East Asia – including China — have managed rapid changes to their export baskets, increased their global export shares in new industries, and achieved fast growth. In Latin America, by contrast, even good performers like Chile, Colombia and Peru stabilised inflation, opened their economies to international trade (tariffs are negligible and they have signed numerous free trade agreements) and capital flows. Yet, they have been unable to diversify their export baskets and achieve sustained growth. The experiences of many nations in Africa and the Middle East resemble those of Latin America.
In this paper, I argue that a focus on exports, both at the intensive margin (where existing products increase their volume), but especially at the extensive margin (where new products start being exported), can help countries figure out what policies to adopt in order to achieve sustained growth. I present five stylised facts about growth and its trends in the decades that followed the Washington Consensus.
Supply-Side Economics of a Good Type: Supporting and Expanding South Africa’s Informal Economy
This paper argues that South Africa’s persistently high unemployment is in part explained by abnormally low levels of informal sector activity compared to other developing countries. Using cross-country data, it shows that South Africa is an outlier, with low informality and high unemployment relative to its income level. If South Africa had informality rates consistent with its income level, unemployment would be much lower at around 7% instead of over 25%. The paper explores regulatory barriers, spatial constraints, lack of infrastructure, and crime as key factors inhibiting the growth of the informal sector. To boost informal activity and employment, it recommends a firm-size based policy matrix addressing these constraints, with a focus on regulatory changes to expand market access, zero-rating of licensing fees, provision of critical infrastructure like storage facilities, and transport vouchers and subsidies to connect informal businesses to markets. Implementing such supply-side policy changes could demonstrate the employment potential of the informal sector and build momentum for broader deregulation.
Japan’s Economic Puzzle
This paper examines Japan’s economic performance in recent years, uncovering a narrative that challenges conventional views. Despite slow productivity growth, Japan maintains the highest economic complexity globally due to its sophisticated export portfolio. The study reveals that while Japan has been experiencing a decline in goods export market shares it has had a rise in services exports, particularly in R&D licensing. Furthermore, Japan has significantly increased its net foreign assets and direct investments abroad, resulting in abnormal high returns. These results put together suggest that Japanese firms —perhaps in reaction to a stagnant domestic labor force—are leveraging their extensive knowledge capital by investing and redeploying resources internationally, which are generating these higher returns. The increasing wealth generated abroad results, we show, in an expansion of non-tradable activities which are less productive, driving down aggregate productivity growth. The paper also highlights concerns over declining innovation quality, posing risks to Japan’s future economic performance and its ability to redeploy its accumulated knowledge to enjoy from unusually high returns from their foreign investments. The findings emphasize the need for policy reforms to enhance innovation quality to sustain Japan’s productivity of non-tradable activities and with an immigration policy that may change the downward trend in labor supply.
Inventing Modern Invention: The Professionalization of Technological Progress in the US
Between the mid-19th and mid-20th centuries, the US transformed from an agricultural economy to the frontier in science, technology, and industry. We study how the US transitioned from traditional craftsmanship-based to today’s science-based innovation. To do so, we digitize half a million pages of patent yearbooks that describe inventors, organizations, and technologies on over 1.6M patents and add demographic information from US census records and information on corporate research activities from large-scale repeated surveys on industrial research labs. Starting in 1920, the 19th-century craftsmanship-based invention was, within just 20 years, overtaken by a rapidly emerging new system based on teamwork and a new specialist class of inventors, engineers. This new system relied on a social innovation: industrial research labs. These labs supported high-skill teamwork, replacing the collaborations within families with professional ties in firms and industrial research labs. This shift had wide-ranging consequences. It not only altered the division of labor in invention, but also reshaped the geography of innovation, reestablishing large cities as epicenters of technological progress and introduced new barriers to patenting for women and foreign-born inventors that have persisted into the 21st century.
Women Seeking Jobs with Limited Information: Evidence from Iraq
Do women apply more for jobs when they know the hiring probability of female job seekers directly from employers? I implemented a randomized control trial and a double-incentivized resume rating to elicit the preferences of employers and job seekers for candidates and vacancies in Iraq. The treatment reveals the job offer rate for women, calculated using the employers’ selection of women divided by the total number of female candidates. After revealing the treatment, the women applied for jobs by three more percentage points than the men in the control group. This paper highlights the value of revealing employers’ preferences to improve the match between female candidates and employers when women underestimate the chances of finding a job.
The Missing Economic Diversity of the Colombian Amazon
Alarming rates of forest loss in the Colombian Amazon have created a perceived trade-off that the only means of achieving economic prosperity is by sacrificing the forest. This study finds little evidence of this trade-off; rather, we find that economic development and forest protection are not an either-or choice. Forest clearing is driven by extensive cattle-ranching as a means to secure land titles. In essence, the loss of some of the world’s richest biodiversity is the result of some of the least economically complex activities that fail to achieve economic prosperity in the region. If anything, the acceleration in deforestation has accompanied a period of economic stagnation.
The existing economic model in the Amazon – centered on agrarian colonization and mineral extraction – has not generated prosperity for the people, all while failing the forest. The exceptional diversity of the Amazon’s biome is not reflected in the region’s economy. The Amazonian economy is best characterized by its low diversity and low complexity. A significant proportion of employment is linked to public administration – more than in other departments of the country. Very little of the production in the departments is destined to be consumed outside the departments (“exported”).
This study seeks to define an alternative economic model for the Colombian Amazon from the perspective of economic complexity with environmental sustainability. Economic complexity research finds that the productive potential of places depends not only on the soil or natural resources, but on the productive capabilities—or knowhow—held by its people. This research finds that the Colombian Amazon will not become rich by adding value to its raw materials or by specializing in one economic activity. Rather, economic development is best described as a process of expanding the set of capabilities present to be able to produce a more diverse set of goods, of increasingly greater complexity. This model starts from the base of understanding the existing productive capabilities in Caquetá, Guaviare, and Putumayo, to identify high-potential economic sectors that build off those capabilities to achieve new, sustainable pathways to shared prosperity.
Achieving shared prosperity in the Amazon depends on the connectivity and opportunity in its urban areas. The primary drivers of greater economic complexity – and prosperity – are the cities in the Amazon. Even in the remote areas of the Amazon, the majority of people in Caquetá, Guaviare, and Putumayo live in urban areas. The low prosperity in the Colombian Amazon is driven by the lack of prosperous cities. The report finds that Amazonian cities are affected by the lack of connectivity to major Colombian cities that limit their ability to ‘export’ things outside the department to then expand the capacity to ‘import’ the things that are not produced locally as a means to improve well-being.
Grants in Wyoming: Constraints and Solutions
Wyoming communities are reliant on grants to fund local priorities, yet the grants system is not effectively meeting the needs of many communities across the state. This problem is central to the growth challenges of many rural economies across the state. Although this problem pre-dates the recent expansion of federal grant programs, the importance of this problem has grown in the last several years as the scale and complexity of federal grant opportunities — particularly discretionary grants — has increased. Wyoming communities are struggling to navigate and benefit from these federal funding opportunities. As of late 2023, the state is significantly underperforming many comparator states in the number of federal grants received and the distribution of federal grants across the state. Grant writers and administrators face a sometimes impossible task in navigating an ever-shifting grants landscape. This is a challenge for local governments across the country but may be especially important in Wyoming due to narrow local tax bases and the rural nature of the state.
Through an eight-month effort combining research and action, we have explored the causes of this problem to inform potential solutions. We have identified four principal constraints that are most to blame for Wyoming’s underperformance: (1) Lack of relationships between communities and funders; (2) Inability to follow changing grant opportunities (esp. federal); (3) Shortage of prioritized community needs and “grant ready” project plans; and (4) Overreliance on “local heroes” – especially for smaller communities. We argue that these challenges are “principal constraints” because they are binding for the largest number of communities, especially smaller communities. However, there are additional constraints that are critical for other communities, especially those that have more experience with accessing state and federal grants. This note summarizes key evidence we have found on each of these principal constraints. These constraints occur early in the grants process, meaning many potentially promising grant opportunities are never pursued. We find that many federal grant programs and discretionary award processes are inconsistent with the realities of scarce staff, resources, and bandwidth of local governments, especially in small communities. However, we find widespread examples and evidence that these constraints can be overcome through actions to enable a strong state-wide network that supports local leaders and grant administrators. Examples of success within the state and in other states show that building the capabilities of the network and enabling all communities to access the knowhow of the network can lead to much better grant outcomes.
The note closes with a discussion of how to target a network-enabling response to the grants problem. We outline a first-best option that centers on establishing regional officers who would be responsible for a set of tasks that would respond directly to the principal constraints identified. This approach would require annual funding, but preliminary analysis shows the return on investment overall would be very high and the approach would have the greatest benefits for smaller communities across the state. Very initial designs have been explored for how to establish such a system building on existing assets. Finally, we compare this first-best approach to alternative approaches that are closer to the current support actions underway in the state.
Scientific and Technical Innovation in the UAE: A Capability-based Approach
The success or failure of the United Arab Emirates’ (UAE) mid- and long-term growth strategy will, in large part, be determined by innovation. The country aims to continue transitioning from its past focus on oil and gas, energy-intensive products, and re-exporting services to a future economic model increasingly relying on high-value, knowledge-intensive goods and services. A successful transition will necessitate importing and adapting frontier foreign innovation, but also creating a world-class innovation ecosystem at home.
Part of this effort will entail developing further the country’s Research and Development (R&D) capabilities. While significant catch-up is already visible, much remains to be done to bring the UAE’s R&D output in line with the ambitions assigned by its leadership. The production of scientific publications and patents has been rapidly increasing over the past few years. However, the current level of scientific publications and international patenting activity remains below that of aspirational peers, such as Singapore and Norway, but also fellow Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries, such as Qatar and Saudi Arabia.
One of the reasons may be simple: there are not enough researchers in the UAE. The proportion of researchers in the UAE’s workforce is below what is expected for such an advanced economy. While the UAE has been successful at attracting foreign students and skilled workers, including in STEM fields which underpin R&D activities, this has not translated into a higher density of researchers in the labor force. Determining whether that results from low current demand for R&D skills due to the country’s current economic structure or from difficulties in producing or attracting R&D talent is difficult, although both likely contribute to the issue.
Inputs for Policy Design: Tools of Economic Diversification in the UAE
This report examines how the United Arab Emirates can leverage three key policy tools to accelerate economic diversification and transition to a knowledge-based economy: Foreign Direct Investment (FDI), Free Zones, and Sovereign Wealth Funds (SWFs). While the UAE has successfully attracted substantial FDI inflows and diversified its export basket over the past two decades, the country continues to underperform in economic complexity and faces challenges attracting knowledge-intensive investments, particularly in research and development activities. The analysis reveals that Free Zones have evolved beyond regulatory arbitrage advantages to become mechanisms for public-private coordination and specialized public goods provision, though their contribution to broader knowledge spillovers remains limited by restrictions on mainland business interactions. Similarly, while the UAE’s SWFs have increasingly pursued domestic diversification objectives through strategic acquisitions and partnerships, their impact could be improved by better aligning foreign investments with domestic capabilities and leveraging multiple channels for knowledge transfer beyond firm relocation. The report recommends a quality-oriented approach to FDI attraction focusing on innovation and R&D activities, adaptive Free Zone management that responds to evolving firm needs, and strategic SWF investments guided by economic complexity metrics, emphasizing that successful diversification requires intensive public-private and public-public coordination across all three tools to provide the necessary inputs for new, complex activities to appear in the UAE’s economic and industrial landscape.
Pandemic-era Inflation Drivers and Global Spillovers
We estimate a multi-country multi-sector New Keynesian model to quantify the drivers of domestic inflation during 2020–2023 in several countries, including the United States. The model matches observed inflation together with sector-level prices and wages. We further measure the relative importance of different types of shocks on inflation across countries over time. The key mechanism, the international transmission of demand, supply and energy shocks through global linkages helps us to match the behavior of the USD/Euro exchange rate. The quantification exercise yields four key findings. First, negative supply shocks to factors of production, labor and intermediate inputs, initially sparked inflation in 2020–2021. Global supply chains and complementarities in production played an amplification role in this initial phase. Second, positive aggregate demand shocks, due to stimulative policies, widened demand-supply imbalances, amplifying inflation further during 2021–2022. Third, the reallocation of consumption between goods and service sectors, a relative sector-level demand shock, played a role in transmitting these imbalances across countries through the global trade and production network. Fourth, global energy shocks have differential impacts on the US relative to other countries’ inflation rates. Further, complementarities between energy and other inputs to production play a particularly important role in the quantitative impact of these shocks on inflation.