Una Estrategia de Crecimiento Económico para Hermosillo
Hermosillo se está quedando atrás en materia de crecimiento económico y diversificación productiva. Históricamente la ciudad se ha beneficiado de una fuerte presencia manufacturera, liderada por Ford, y un capital humano de alta calidad; sin embargo, se quedó rezagada con respecto a ciudades comparativas en términos de creación de empleo y diversificación económica entre 2010-2020. Este bajo desempeño se deriva principalmente de un menor crecimiento y diversificación de la industria manufacturera en comparación con ciudades mexicanas más dinámicas. Es importante destacar que Hermosillo mantiene importantes ventajas competitivas, sobre todo en infraestructura logística, costos de y acceso a electricidad, y calidad del capital humano. Pero también enfrenta retos en materia de sustentabilidad del agua, de asequibilidad y de oferta de vivienda, así como de movilidad urbana. Hermosillo debe encontrar una combinación de políticas públicas que le permitan capitalizar en sus ventajas, así como solucionar las potenciales restricciones al crecimiento que va a enfrentar.
Hermosillo tiene claras oportunidades para acelerar su crecimiento económico. Hay tres cambios importantes en el contexto global que Hermosillo puede aprovechar: la transición energética, la relocalización de las cadenas de suministro y el boom del comercio internacional de servicios digitales. Estas tres tendencias se alinean particularmente con algunas de las ventajas competitivas existentes de Hermosillo. La ubicación estratégica de la ciudad cerca del mercado estadounidense, la mano de obra calificada, sus instituciones educativas y los abundantes recursos solares la ponen en buena posición para capitalizar estos cambios a través de acciones de política pública.
Las oportunidades económicas de Hermosillo podrían desbloquearse si la ciudad resuelve estratégicamente sus principales limitaciones. La gestión sostenible del agua y la mejora de su planificación urbana, particularmente en vivienda y transporte público, son las restricciones más urgentes que, una vez atendidas, permitirían a la ciudad crecer a un ritmo más cercano a su potencial. El incremento de la oferta vivienda y el desarrollo de un sistema de transporte público eficiente reduciría los costos de vida y los costos laborales para las empresas, haciendo a Hermosillo más atractiva para trabajadores e inversionistas. A su vez, es necesario establecer un modelo sostenible de gestión del agua que permita garantizar el crecimiento futuro de la ciudad. La resolución de estas limitaciones es esencial para posicionar a Hermosillo como un centro importante para las cadenas de suministro de manufactura avanzada, de la industria verde y de servicios digitales en el norte de México. La ciudad tiene muchos elementos a su favor para prosperar, pero requiere abordar estas limitaciones de manera coordinada para desbloquear su próxima fase de crecimiento económico.
Growth Through Diversification in Hermosillo
In this report, we study Hermosillo’s economic performance and assess critical issues affecting the city’s ability to achieve stronger economic growth. Although Hermosillo is far from experiencing economic stagnation, it fell behind other cities that managed to become successful economic hubs between 2010 and 2020. The main reason behind this trailing growth is Hermosillo’s relatively low diversification and investment dynamics, especially in the manufacturing sector. We apply growth diagnostic testing on various potential constraints to economic growth: logistics, electricity, water, human capital, housing, and transportation. Although none of them have directly constrained economic growth in the past, some are explicit threats to increasing growth in the future, thus catching up with high-performing peers. Electricity, human capital, and logistics are comparative advantages, while water, housing, and transportation are threats.
In 2025, Mexico is expected to start a new period in its economic history marked by the promise of nearshoring and a new presidential administration. In the past, Mexico has gone through milestones that heavily impacted its economic development path, like the establishment of NAFTA and the China Shock (Hanson, 2010). The rise of Northern Mexico and other regions like El Bajío as global manufacturing hubs has resulted from greater integration with the North American market. This has brought foreign direct investments (FDI) targeted at establishing manufacturing sites primarily to cater to US demand and exports to the rest of the world. Mexico holds high expectations that nearshoring will bring opportunities of the same or greater magnitude. In that context, Hermosillo stands out as a city with the potential to exploit those opportunities and enhance its economic transformation. It is crucial to analyze its binding constraints for economic growth, comparative advantages, and potential concerns to understand how well-positioned Hermosillo is to take advantage of this momentum.
Following the introduction and a methodological overview, the report is divided into four main sections. Section 3 provides a growth perspective on Hermosillo; Section 4 presents an analysis of growth constraints; Section 5 explains the local diversification challenge in detail; and Section 6 describes strategic policy areas to accelerate growth that result from this growth diagnostic analysis.
Japan’s Economic Puzzle
This paper examines Japan’s economic performance in recent years, uncovering a narrative that challenges conventional views. Despite slow productivity growth, Japan maintains the highest economic complexity globally due to its sophisticated export portfolio. The study reveals that while Japan has been experiencing a decline in goods export market shares it has had a rise in services exports, particularly in R&D licensing. Furthermore, Japan has significantly increased its net foreign assets and direct investments abroad, resulting in abnormal high returns. These results put together suggest that Japanese firms —perhaps in reaction to a stagnant domestic labor force—are leveraging their extensive knowledge capital by investing and redeploying resources internationally, which are generating these higher returns. The increasing wealth generated abroad results, we show, in an expansion of non-tradable activities which are less productive, driving down aggregate productivity growth. The paper also highlights concerns over declining innovation quality, posing risks to Japan’s future economic performance and its ability to redeploy its accumulated knowledge to enjoy from unusually high returns from their foreign investments. The findings emphasize the need for policy reforms to enhance innovation quality to sustain Japan’s productivity of non-tradable activities and with an immigration policy that may change the downward trend in labor supply.
Scientific and Technical Innovation in the UAE: A Capability-based Approach
The success or failure of the United Arab Emirates’ (UAE) mid- and long-term growth strategy will, in large part, be determined by innovation. The country aims to continue transitioning from its past focus on oil and gas, energy-intensive products, and re-exporting services to a future economic model increasingly relying on high-value, knowledge-intensive goods and services. A successful transition will necessitate importing and adapting frontier foreign innovation, but also creating a world-class innovation ecosystem at home.
Part of this effort will entail developing further the country’s Research and Development (R&D) capabilities. While significant catch-up is already visible, much remains to be done to bring the UAE’s R&D output in line with the ambitions assigned by its leadership. The production of scientific publications and patents has been rapidly increasing over the past few years. However, the current level of scientific publications and international patenting activity remains below that of aspirational peers, such as Singapore and Norway, but also fellow Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries, such as Qatar and Saudi Arabia.
One of the reasons may be simple: there are not enough researchers in the UAE. The proportion of researchers in the UAE’s workforce is below what is expected for such an advanced economy. While the UAE has been successful at attracting foreign students and skilled workers, including in STEM fields which underpin R&D activities, this has not translated into a higher density of researchers in the labor force. Determining whether that results from low current demand for R&D skills due to the country’s current economic structure or from difficulties in producing or attracting R&D talent is difficult, although both likely contribute to the issue.
Inputs for Policy Design: Tools of Economic Diversification in the UAE
This report examines how the United Arab Emirates can leverage three key policy tools to accelerate economic diversification and transition to a knowledge-based economy: Foreign Direct Investment (FDI), Free Zones, and Sovereign Wealth Funds (SWFs). While the UAE has successfully attracted substantial FDI inflows and diversified its export basket over the past two decades, the country continues to underperform in economic complexity and faces challenges attracting knowledge-intensive investments, particularly in research and development activities. The analysis reveals that Free Zones have evolved beyond regulatory arbitrage advantages to become mechanisms for public-private coordination and specialized public goods provision, though their contribution to broader knowledge spillovers remains limited by restrictions on mainland business interactions. Similarly, while the UAE’s SWFs have increasingly pursued domestic diversification objectives through strategic acquisitions and partnerships, their impact could be improved by better aligning foreign investments with domestic capabilities and leveraging multiple channels for knowledge transfer beyond firm relocation. The report recommends a quality-oriented approach to FDI attraction focusing on innovation and R&D activities, adaptive Free Zone management that responds to evolving firm needs, and strategic SWF investments guided by economic complexity metrics, emphasizing that successful diversification requires intensive public-private and public-public coordination across all three tools to provide the necessary inputs for new, complex activities to appear in the UAE’s economic and industrial landscape.
The Economic Complexity of the UAE: Diversification into Goods and Services
The UAE has achieved significant economic diversification over the past two decades, with non-oil goods exports growing 7.7% annually (2005-19) and services exports expanding by a factor of 3.5, driven primarily by transport, logistics, tourism, and stone/metals products. However, the current export matrix remains energy-intensive and exhibits relatively low economic complexity compared to aspirational peers, indicating limited accumulation of sophisticated productive know-how and suggesting constraints on future growth potential. This report applies economic complexity theory to identify a country-specific diversification roadmap, using density measures to assess feasibility based on the UAE’s existing capabilities and prioritizing opportunities with high complexity and growing global demand. Through this systematic sector identification process, we identify 63 products and 18 service industries organized into ten diversification themes: five in goods (food, metals, chemicals, plastics, and machinery) and five in services (ICT, financial services, business services, healthcare, and creative industries). Given the UAE’s relatively low Complexity Outlook Index, achieving further structural transformation will require active policies to accumulate productive capacities, execute well-targeted capability jumps, and strengthen state capacity to address market failures inherent in the self-discovery process.