Scientific and Technical Innovation in the UAE: A Capability-based Approach

The success or failure of the United Arab Emirates’ (UAE) mid- and long-term growth strategy will, in large part, be determined by innovation. The country aims to continue transitioning from its past focus on oil and gas, energy-intensive products, and re-exporting services to a future economic model increasingly relying on high-value, knowledge-intensive goods and services. A successful transition will necessitate importing and adapting frontier foreign innovation, but also creating a world-class innovation ecosystem at home.

Part of this effort will entail developing further the country’s Research and Development (R&D) capabilities. While significant catch-up is already visible, much remains to be done to bring the UAE’s R&D output in line with the ambitions assigned by its leadership. The production of scientific publications and patents has been rapidly increasing over the past few years. However, the current level of scientific publications and international patenting activity remains below that of aspirational peers, such as Singapore and Norway, but also fellow Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries, such as Qatar and Saudi Arabia.

One of the reasons may be simple: there are not enough researchers in the UAE. The proportion of researchers in the UAE’s workforce is below what is expected for such an advanced economy. While the UAE has been successful at attracting foreign students and skilled workers, including in STEM fields which underpin R&D activities, this has not translated into a higher density of researchers in the labor force. Determining whether that results from low current demand for R&D skills due to the country’s current economic structure or from difficulties in producing or attracting R&D talent is difficult, although both likely contribute to the issue.

Catalyzing Green Growth in the UAE: Growth Opportunities in a Decarbonizing World

The world is rapidly shifting towards a lower-carbon economy, drawing a new map of comparative advantage in the process. As the global economy decarbonizes, it will bring about profound changes in the landscape of production, giving rise to new industries, markets, and pathways for economic development. This transformation will manifest through changes in global demand and prices for existing products but also through the emergence of novel technologies and industries, many of which will replace older, carbon-intensive practices and production methods. These trends will have a significant impact on the fundamental competitiveness of every economy. Therefore, it is crucial for national economic policies, including in the United Arab Emirates, to include a well-designed green growth strategy to harness the global drive towards a decarbonized world economy.

This report aims to identify green growth opportunities for the UAE through a structured approach and suggest concrete policy ideas to seize them. We analyze green growth opportunities along the following four pillars: (1) make the enablers of decarbonization; (2) make green versions of energy-intensive products; (3) capitalize on carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS); and (4) export decarbonization-related know-how.

One of the most promising opportunities identified lies in the development of green industrial parks. The UAE should consider establishing such green industrial parks to attract energy-intensive industries aiming to switch to low-carbon production processes. These parks provide the necessary inputs to low-carbon industrial production in a concentrated geographical area. These include dedicated low-cost renewable energy, but also clean, high-temperature heat, low-carbon hydrogen, as well as carbon capture technology and other services necessary to certify the green nature of the production. A net-zero world will need to make things like steel, cement, chemicals, aluminum, and glass without emitting carbon. It will also need to develop fuels for ships, planes, and heavy-duty transport that have near-zero life cycle emissions, a large proportion of which are expected to come from renewable energy that is used to make hydrogen and liquid fuels. Low solar energy costs make the UAE one of the best places to develop low-carbon energy-intensive industries. Additionally, the UAE has a low cost of capital, which is an important comparative advantage since many of these industrial activities are highly capital-intensive. As the world transitions towards a decarbonized global economy, green industrial parks will drive high-value green economic activities to locate in the UAE, resulting in stronger exports, more value-added, and a future-proof economic model for the country.

As developing green industrial parks is complex, this is an opportunity to accumulate valuable know-how that, in turn, can be monetized. For instance, nobody yet knows how to build, manage, and operate a multi-gigawatt green hydrogen production facility. In the process of building green industrial parks in the UAE, the UAE will have to learn how to optimize a very complex renewable energy system, balance electricity, heat, and hydrogen across multiple energy users with different load profiles, and deploy multiple new technologies together that are still in the pilot phase.

The UAE should consider monetizing its domestic experience by developing and exporting green industrial parks in other countries and developing a business model around these activities. Such a strategy could involve (1) owning the Engineering, Procurement, and Construction Management (EPCM) contractors and other related businesses that develop and operate parks; (2) where possible, having as much of the high-income knowledge workers who provide these services live and work in the UAE; and (3) helping UAE industrial companies that wish to expand abroad (such as Emirates Global Aluminium, or Emirates Steel Arkan) make profitable foreign investments in green industrial parks in other countries.

There may be another opportunity in critical minerals processing. A mining boom is required to provide the world with enough critical minerals to build a clean energy system. Currently, China is dominating the critical minerals processing market, but many countries are looking to diversify their critical minerals supply chain. Given its low cost of capital, strategic location, and good trading infrastructure, the UAE is well-positioned to take advantage of this opportunity. The country already has nascent strengths in mineral refining to build off, in the aluminum and, soon, in the lithium value chains.

Other promising policy ideas are centered on accelerating the creation of green growth knowledge in the UAE and encouraging high-potential business applications. Given their potentially large implications for low-carbon industrial processes in the UAE, we recommend that the government consider establishing applied research hubs in the areas of electrochemistry and thermal energy management & storage. Our research has already identified leading actors in this area that may be attractive partners for collaboration. Additionally, to ensure the close monitoring of the innovation and technology developed abroad, we recommend discussing the establishment of a green technologies working group within the Emirates Scientist Council. This working group would continuously monitor advances in green technologies and their impact on the UAE, reporting findings to the higher levels of government to inform strategic decisions.

Housing in Wyoming: Constraints and Solutions

Quantitative evidence supports the contention that Wyoming’s housing market is constrained, to a greater degree than many other parts of the US. Prices are persistently above expectations given economic fundamentals in most parts of the state, and the supply of new housing in Wyoming is on average less responsive to price increases than in other US counties. This has undermined natural population growth and contributed to a low amount of population density close to city centers in Wyoming, as compared to other US cities with comparable population levels. Importantly, this phenomenon is not simply the result of pandemic-era economic frictions. The evidence shows that these constraints have durably persisted in Wyoming. 

This housing constraint weighs heavily on the broader Wyoming economy, and chokes off growth in new industries that could add to the Wyoming economy beyond its natural resource base. Businesses consistently report a lack of access to workforce as a leading problem that ultimately results from a lack of housing. Some businesses have even tried to create their own housing for employees, and news reports abound of teachers and nurses who secure jobs in Wyoming communities but then have to leave because they cannot find housing.

Key problems behind Wyoming’s housing constraints include excessive regulations concerning housing density and insufficient investment in arterial infrastructure. For example, there is evidence that over-regulated minimum lot sizes in Wyoming are blocking the creation of supply to match free-market demand for houses with smaller amounts of land. Other areas of over-regulation include those concerning allowable housing types, building height, parking spaces per dwelling, and the housing approval process itself. This may be seen as surprising given Wyoming’s reputation as a low-regulation state, but Wyoming maintains restrictions that other states and countries have discarded as outdated and highly counterproductive. Besides outright restrictions on housing development, we find that the most common cost driver undermining the housing development has to do with low public investment in needed arterial infrastructure, especially water systems. Land supply as well as material and construction costs are not primary constraints to housing development across the state, but may matter for select communities.

We suggest a portfolio of policy changes for the state of Wyoming to explore in order to solve its housing constraints. One category of changes is regulatory, and focuses on deregulation, reducing bureaucratic overhead, and shifting from veto-cratic to democratic housing approval procedures. Another category is focused on investment on infrastructure to support housing, and exploration of state-local funding structures to facilitate continuous infrastructure improvement. If implemented, these changes will not only help to solve Wyoming’s housing constraints but also facilitate housing development in a way that combats urban sprawl, and in doing so protects open spaces outside of cities that Wyomingites value.

Related project: Pathways to Prosperity in Wyoming

The impact of return migration on employment and wages in Mexican cities

How does return migration from the US to Mexico affect local workers? Return migrants increase the local labor supply, potentially hurting local workers. However, having been exposed to a more advanced U.S. economy, they may also carry human capital that benefits non-migrants. Using an instrument based on involuntary return migration, we find that, whereas workers who share returnees’ occupations experience a fall in wages, workers in other occupations see their wages rise. These effects are, however, transitory and restricted to the city-industry receiving the returnees. In contrast, returnees permanently alter a city’s long-run industrial composition, by raising employment levels in the local industries that hire them.

A Growth Perspective on Wyoming

This report sets out to understand if the economy of the State of Wyoming is positioned to grow into the future. To do this, the report begins by investigating the past. To know where the state economy could be headed, and how that direction may be improved, it is critical to understand how the state developed the economic structure and drivers that it has today. Thus, Wyoming’s economic trajectory is explored over the long, medium, and short term. From this investigation, we find that Wyoming faces an overall growth problem, but we also find a high degree of variation in economic engines and growth prospects across the state. The problem that this report identifies is that the composition of economic activities is not positioned to sustain a high quality of life across all parts of the state.

“Across all parts of the state” is an essential part of the problem statement for Wyoming. While some local and regional economies in the state are growing and bumping up against identifiable constraints, other local and regional economies are experiencing sustained contractions and will require new sources of growth in order to retain (or expand) population and high quality of life. Since economic dynamics vary significantly across the state, analysis is conducted in as much geographic detail as possible. By combining historical and geographic dimensions of growth, this report aims to inform pathways for sustained and inclusive prosperity across Wyoming.

Related project: Pathways to Prosperity in Wyoming

Seeing the Forest for More than the Trees: A Policy Strategy to Curb Deforestation and Advance Shared Prosperity in the Colombian Amazon

Does economic prosperity in the Colombian Amazon require sacrificing the forest? This research compendium of a series of studies on the Colombian Amazon finds the answer to this question is no: the perceived trade-off between economic growth and forest protection is a false dichotomy. The drivers of deforestation and prosperity are distinct – as they happen in different places. Deforestation occurs at the agricultural frontier, in destroying some of the world’s most complex biodiversity by some of the least economically complex activities, particularly cattle-ranching. By contrast, the economic drivers in the Amazon are its urban areas often located far from the forest edge, including in non-forested piedmont regions. These cities offer greater economic complexity by accessing a wider range of productive capabilities in higher-income activities with little presence of those activities driving deforestation. Perhaps the most underappreciated facet of life in each of the three Amazonian regions studied, Caquetá, Guaviare, and Putumayo, is that the majority of people live in urban areas. This is a telling fact of economic geography: that even in the remote parts of the Amazon, people want to come together to live in densely populated areas. This corroborates the findings of our global research over the past two decades that prosperity results from expanding the productive capabilities available locally to diversify production to do more, and more complex, activities.

The Economic Complexity of the UAE: Diversification into Goods and Services


The UAE has achieved significant economic diversification over the past two decades, with non-oil goods exports growing 7.7% annually (2005-19) and services exports expanding by a factor of 3.5, driven primarily by transport, logistics, tourism, and stone/metals products. However, the current export matrix remains energy-intensive and exhibits relatively low economic complexity compared to aspirational peers, indicating limited accumulation of sophisticated productive know-how and suggesting constraints on future growth potential. This report applies economic complexity theory to identify a country-specific diversification roadmap, using density measures to assess feasibility based on the UAE’s existing capabilities and prioritizing opportunities with high complexity and growing global demand. Through this systematic sector identification process, we identify 63 products and 18 service industries organized into ten diversification themes: five in goods (food, metals, chemicals, plastics, and machinery) and five in services (ICT, financial services, business services, healthcare, and creative industries). Given the UAE’s relatively low Complexity Outlook Index, achieving further structural transformation will require active policies to accumulate productive capacities, execute well-targeted capability jumps, and strengthen state capacity to address market failures inherent in the self-discovery process.

A Growth Diagnostic of Kazakhstan

This Growth Diagnostic Report was generated as part of a research engagement between the Growth Lab at Harvard University and the Astana International Financial Centre (AIFC) between June 2021 and December 2022. The purpose of the engagement was to formulate evidence-based policy options to address critical issues facing the economy of Kazakhstan through innovative frameworks such as growth diagnostics and economic complexity. This report is accompanied by the Economic Complexity Report that applies findings from this report on economy-wide challenges to growth and diversification in order to formulate attractive and feasible opportunities for diversification.

Kazakhstan faces multifaceted challenges to sustainable and inclusive growth: macroeconomic uncertainty, an uneven economic playing field, and difficulties in acquiring productive capabilities, agglomerating them locally, and accessing export markets. Underlying Kazakhstan’s transformational growth in the last two decades—during which real GDP per capita multiplied by 2.5x—are two periods that underscore how Kazakhstan’s growth trajectory has been correlated with oil and gas dynamics. The early and mid-2000s characterized by the global commodity supercycle led to an expansion of the economy upwards of 8% annually, with a mild slowdown during the global financial crisis. In 2014, Kazakhstan’s growth slowed with the collapse of commodity prices, and alternative engines of growth have not been strong enough to fend against volatility since. These trends, along with growing uncertainty in the long-run demand of oil and gas, continue to highlight the limitations of relying on natural resources to drive development.

As in the experience of other major oil producers, diversification of Kazakhstan’s non-oil economy is a critical pathway to drive a new era of sustainable and inclusive growth and mitigate the impacts of commodity price shocks on the country’s economy. Kazakhstan’s growth trajectory demonstrates that the country has enough oil to suffer symptoms of Dutch disease, but not enough to position it as a reliable engine of growth in the future. Development of non-oil activities has been a policy objective of the government of Kazakhstan for some time, but previous efforts for target sectors have failed to generate sufficient exports and investments to produce alternative engines of growth. This report characterizes the relationship between growth, industrial policy, and the constraints to diversification in Kazakhstan. It utilizes the growth diagnostics framework to understand why efforts to diversify into non-oil tradables has been challenging. The report proposes a growth syndrome to explain the constraints preventing Kazakhstan from achieving productive diversification and sustainable growth.

This report is organized in six sections, including a brief introduction.

Related project: Sustainable and Inclusive Growth in Kazakhstan

The Economic Complexity of Kazakhstan: A Roadmap for Sustainable and Inclusive Growth

Since the end of the 1990s, Kazakhstan has relied on oil and gas as the main drivers of economic growth. While this has led to rapid development of the country, especially during years of high oil prices, it has also subjected the economy to more severe downturns during oil shocks, bouts of currency overvaluation, and procyclicality in growth and public spending.

Stronger economic diversification has the potential to drive a new era of sustainable growth by supporting new sources of value added and export revenue, creating new and better jobs, and making the economy more resistant to fluctuations in oil dynamics. However, repeated efforts to stimulate alternative, non-oil engines of growth have so far been inconclusive.

This report introduces a new framework to identify opportunities for economic diversification in Kazakhstan. This framework attempts to improve upon previous methods, notably by building country and region-specific challenges to the development of the non-oil economy directly into the framework to identify feasible and attractive opportunities. These challenges are presented in detail in the Growth Diagnostic of Kazakhstan and are summarized along three high-level constraints: (i) an uneven economic playing field dominated by government-related public and private-entities; (ii) difficulties in acquiring productive capabilities, agglomerating them locally, and accessing export markets; and (iii) ongoing macroeconomic factors lowering external competitiveness lower and making the economy less stable.

Our approach applies the economic complexity paradigm to identify what specific products and industries are most feasible for diversification, based on the existing productive capabilities demonstrated in the economy. We examine Kazakhstan’s economic complexity at the national but also subnational levels, highlighting the heterogeneity of export baskets across regions that makes an analysis of opportunities at the subnational level essential.

Related project: Sustainable and Inclusive Growth in Kazakhstan

Development in a Complex World: The Case of Ethiopia

This research compendium provides an explanation of Ethiopia’s fundamental economic challenge of slowing economic growth after an exceptional growth acceleration — a challenge that has been compounded by COVID-19, conflict, and climate change impacts. Ethiopia has experienced exceptional growth since the early 2000s but began to see a slowdown in the capacity of the economy to grow, export, and produce jobs since roughly 2015. This intensified a set of macroeconomic challenges, including high, volatile, and escalating inflation. This compendium identifies a path forward for more sustainable and inclusive growth that builds on the government’s Homegrown Economic Reform strategy. It includes growth diagnostics and economic complexity research as well as applications to unpack interacting macroeconomic distortions and inform diversification strategies. Drawing on lessons from past success in Ethiopia and new constraints, this compendium offers insights into what the Government of Ethiopia and the international community must do to unlock resilient, post-conflict economic recovery across Ethiopia.

The research across the chapters of this compendium was developed during the Growth Lab’s research project in Ethiopia from 2019 to 2022, supported through a grant by the United States Agency of International Development (USAID). This research effort, which was at times conducted in close collaboration with government and non-government researchers in Ethiopia, pushed the boundaries of Growth Lab research. The project team worked to understand to intensive shocks faced by the country and enable local capability building in the context of limited government resources in a very low-income country. Given the value of this learning, this compendium not only discusses challenges and opportunities in Ethiopia in significant detail but also describes how various tools of diagnostic work and economic strategy-building were used in practice. As such, it aims to serve as a teaching resource for how economic tools can be applied to unique development contexts. The compendium reveals lessons for Ethiopian policymakers regarding the country’s development path as well as numerous lessons that the development community and development practitioners can learn from Ethiopia.