Diagnosing Wyoming’s Workforce Challenges

Wyoming is facing two distinct labor market challenges: in the short-term low workforce availability is a constraint while in the long-term job and wage growth have stagnated. Currently, Wyoming’s labor market is characterized by tightness and employers are struggling to fill positions. However, the current tightness of the labor market is not a phenomenon that is specific to Wyoming but instead is prevalent across the country. What sets Wyoming apart is the lack of growth in employment and wages over the long-term. Understanding these differing dynamics is important because policy responses may attempt to address the short-term issue without considering the underlying structural causes of the long-term dynamics. This will likely be ineffective and not lead to lasting change. For lasting change, the structural issues of the long-term dynamic need to be addressed.

An often-discussed solution is to increase the supply of training and education – this has merits in its own right but will not solve the long-term labor market challenge facing Wyoming. Only 38% of all jobs in Wyoming require tertiary education, the second lowest of any US state. Additionally, our analysis shows that the returns to a tertiary degree in Wyoming are significantly below those of its peers. Unsurprisingly, the lack of demand for tertiary-educated workers leads many young Wyomingites with a tertiary degree to leave the state. Overall, however, Wyoming has become an exporter of well-trained young people. Increasing the supply of tertiary education will not address the underlying structural issues facing the labor market.

A main driver of Wyoming’s lagging performance has been the comparatively low labor productivity in the state. Most of Wyoming’s industries have a lower output per worker than the respective national industry and pay lower wages on average. Industries that fall into this category cover 82.8% of all employment in Wyoming. The few industries in which Wyoming is more productive than the rest of the US are mostly related to natural resource extraction. Wage dynamics of occupations in the state exert a similar pattern where STEM-related occupations have not seen much growth, indicating low demand in the state.

To address the long-term issue, Wyoming needs to create the conditions for a more complex economy that can use the potential of its human capital instead of excessively relying on its natural resources. The challenge is to attract and grow competitive companies in industries with strong demand. A critical factor in doing so is scale. Many more knowledge-intensive industries tend to develop in places that are larger urban agglomerations. Wyoming should focus on the positive forces of agglomeration to develop these industries and make use of the productive potential it has. Creating the conditions for this includes place-based investments and an enabling regulatory framework. In Wyoming, housing regulations have been an important barrier preventing further agglomerations, but efforts are underway to address this barrier.

In the short-term, solutions that are focused on increasing the available labor pool within the state appear most promising in easing the current constraint. This is especially true when they address structural barriers that could persist after the labor market cools off. Our work documents specific recommendations within the areas of childcare, justice-involved individuals, higher education, and out-of-state workers (Section 3.2) that aim to increase the participation from these labor pools in Wyoming’s workforce. These are labor pools that are significant in size and have underutilized potential in terms of labor force participation within the state.

Related project: Pathways to Prosperity in Wyoming

A Growth Diagnostic of Kazakhstan

This Growth Diagnostic Report was generated as part of a research engagement between the Growth Lab at Harvard University and the Astana International Financial Centre (AIFC) between June 2021 and December 2022. The purpose of the engagement was to formulate evidence-based policy options to address critical issues facing the economy of Kazakhstan through innovative frameworks such as growth diagnostics and economic complexity. This report is accompanied by the Economic Complexity Report that applies findings from this report on economy-wide challenges to growth and diversification in order to formulate attractive and feasible opportunities for diversification.

Kazakhstan faces multifaceted challenges to sustainable and inclusive growth: macroeconomic uncertainty, an uneven economic playing field, and difficulties in acquiring productive capabilities, agglomerating them locally, and accessing export markets. Underlying Kazakhstan’s transformational growth in the last two decades—during which real GDP per capita multiplied by 2.5x—are two periods that underscore how Kazakhstan’s growth trajectory has been correlated with oil and gas dynamics. The early and mid-2000s characterized by the global commodity supercycle led to an expansion of the economy upwards of 8% annually, with a mild slowdown during the global financial crisis. In 2014, Kazakhstan’s growth slowed with the collapse of commodity prices, and alternative engines of growth have not been strong enough to fend against volatility since. These trends, along with growing uncertainty in the long-run demand of oil and gas, continue to highlight the limitations of relying on natural resources to drive development.

As in the experience of other major oil producers, diversification of Kazakhstan’s non-oil economy is a critical pathway to drive a new era of sustainable and inclusive growth and mitigate the impacts of commodity price shocks on the country’s economy. Kazakhstan’s growth trajectory demonstrates that the country has enough oil to suffer symptoms of Dutch disease, but not enough to position it as a reliable engine of growth in the future. Development of non-oil activities has been a policy objective of the government of Kazakhstan for some time, but previous efforts for target sectors have failed to generate sufficient exports and investments to produce alternative engines of growth. This report characterizes the relationship between growth, industrial policy, and the constraints to diversification in Kazakhstan. It utilizes the growth diagnostics framework to understand why efforts to diversify into non-oil tradables has been challenging. The report proposes a growth syndrome to explain the constraints preventing Kazakhstan from achieving productive diversification and sustainable growth.

This report is organized in six sections, including a brief introduction.

Section 2 provides an overview of the methodological approach to the Growth Diagnostics analysis.
Section 3 describes Kazakhstan’s growth trajectory and macroeconomic performance, as well as the motivations behind pursuing a diversification strategy to strengthen the non-oil economy.
Section 4 summarizes three features of the country that manifest in a set of economy-wide constraints to growth and diversification.
Section 5 analyzes each of the identified constraints in detail, describing their dynamics and breaking down the aspects that appear to be binding.
Section 6 concludes by suggesting potential policy guidelines towards alleviation of the identified constraints.

The Economic Complexity of Kazakhstan: A Roadmap for Sustainable and Inclusive Growth

Since the end of the 1990s, Kazakhstan has relied on oil and gas as the main drivers of economic growth. While this has led to rapid development of the country, especially during years of high oil prices, it has also subjected the economy to more severe downturns during oil shocks, bouts of currency overvaluation, and procyclicality in growth and public spending.

Stronger economic diversification has the potential to drive a new era of sustainable growth by supporting new sources of value added and export revenue, creating new and better jobs, and making the economy more resistant to fluctuations in oil dynamics. However, repeated efforts to stimulate alternative, non-oil engines of growth have so far been inconclusive.

This report introduces a new framework to identify opportunities for economic diversification in Kazakhstan. This framework attempts to improve upon previous methods, notably by building country and region-specific challenges to the development of the non-oil economy directly into the framework to identify feasible and attractive opportunities. These challenges are presented in detail in the Growth Diagnostic of Kazakhstan and are summarized along three high-level constraints: (i) an uneven economic playing field dominated by government-related public and private-entities; (ii) difficulties in acquiring productive capabilities, agglomerating them locally, and accessing export markets; and (iii) ongoing macroeconomic factors lowering external competitiveness lower and making the economy less stable.

Our approach applies the economic complexity paradigm to identify what specific products and industries are most feasible for diversification, based on the existing productive capabilities demonstrated in the economy. We examine Kazakhstan’s economic complexity at the national but also subnational levels, highlighting the heterogeneity of export baskets across regions that makes an analysis of opportunities at the subnational level essential.