South Africa Growth Initiative

Project Dates

2006–2008

The Growth Lab and the Center for International Development convened a panel of international experts from Harvard University, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, the University of Michigan, and other institutions to work with South African economists to study that country’s constraints to and opportunities for accelerated growth. This multi-year project (2006-2008) was an initiative of the National Treasury of the Republic of South Africa within the government’s Accelerated and Shared Growth Initiative (ASGI-SA), which seeks to consolidate the gains of post-transition economic stability and accelerate growth in order to create employment and improve the livelihoods of all South Africans.

Affiliated Publications

  • Growth Lab
  • Working Papers

    Hausmann, R., Rodrik, D. & Sabel, C., 2008

    Reconfiguring Industrial Policy: A Framework with an Application to South Africa

    The main purpose of industrial policy is to speed up the process of structural change towards higher productivity activities. This paper builds on our earlier writings to present an overall […]
    Growth Lab
    The main purpose of industrial policy is to speed up the process of structural change towards higher productivity activities. This paper builds on our earlier writings to present an overall design for the conduct of industrial policy in a low- to middle-income country. It is stimulated by the specific problems faced by South Africa and by our discussions with business and government officials in that country. We present specific recommendations for the South African government in the penultimate section of the paper.
  • Working Papers

    Hausmann, R., Klinger, B. & Lawrence, R., 2008

    Examining Beneficiation

    Beneficiation, moving downstream, and promoting greater value added in natural resources are very common policy initiatives to stimulate new export sectors in developing countries, largely based on the premise that […]
    Growth Lab
    Beneficiation, moving downstream, and promoting greater value added in natural resources are very common policy initiatives to stimulate new export sectors in developing countries, largely based on the premise that this is a natural and logical path for structural transformation. But upon closer examination, we find that very few countries that export raw materials also export their processed forms, or transition to greater processing. The quantitative analysis finds that broad factor intensities do a much better job of identifying patterns of production and structural transformation than forward linkages, which have an insignificant impact despite the fact that our data is biased against finding significant effects of factor intensities and towards finding significant effects of forward linkages. Moreover, the explanatory power of forward linkages is even smaller in sectors with high transport costs, and in sectors classified as primary products or raw materials, which are the most common targets of such policies. Finally, the results are the same even when only considering developed countries, meaning that colonial legacy inhibiting transitions to natural resource processing are not to blame. These results suggest that policies to promote greater downstream processing as an export promotion policy are misguided. Structural transformation favors sectors with similar technological requirements, factor intensities, and other requisite capabilities, not products connected in production chains. There is no reason for countries like South Africa to focus attention on beneficiation at the expense of policies that would allow other export sectors to emerge. This makes no sense conceptually, and is completely inconsistent with international experience. Quite simply, beneficiation is a bad policy paradigm.
  • Working Papers

    Hausmann, R. & Klinger, B., 2006

    South Africa’s Export Predicament

    This paper explores export performance in South Africa over the past 50 years, and concludes that a lagging process of structural transformation is part of the explanation for stagnant exports […]
    Growth Lab

    This paper explores export performance in South Africa over the past 50 years, and concludes that a lagging process of structural transformation is part of the explanation for stagnant exports per capita. Slow structural transformation in South Africa is found to be a consequence of the peripheral nature of South Africa’s productive capabilities. We apply new tools to evaluate South Africa’s future prospects for structural transformation, as well as to explore the sectoral priorities of the DTI’s draft industrial strategy. We then discuss policy conclusions, advocating an ‘open-architecture’ industrial policy where the methods applied herein are but one tool to screen private sector requests for sector-specific coordination and public goods.

    This paper is part of the South Africa Growth Initiative.

See All

Additional Publications

Two Policies to Alleviate Unemployment in South Africa
James Levinsoh
[Corresponding policy brief]

Is Black Economic Empowerment a South African Growth Catalyst? (Or Could it Be…)
Matthew Andrews

Estimating SARB’s Policy Reaction Rule
Alberto Ortiz and Federico Sturzenegger
[Corresponding policy brief]

SACU Tariff Policies: Where Should They Go From Here?
Lawrence Edwards and Robert Lawrence
[Corresponding policy brief]

The Cyclicality of Monetary and Fiscal Policy in South Africa since 1994
Stan du Plessis, Ben Smit, and Federico Sturzenegger
[Corresponding policy brief]

Identifying Aggregate Supply and Demand Shocks in South Africa
Stan du Plessis, Ben Smit, and Federico Sturzenegger
[Corresponding policy brief]

Procurement Issues in South Africa that Affect Growth and Development
Steven Kelman

Through the Pass-Through: Measuring Central Bank Credibility
Roberto Rigobon

On the Rand: Determinants of the South African Exchange Rate
Jeffrey Frankel
[Corresponding policy brief]

South Africa: Macroeconomic Challenges after a Decade of Success
Jeffrey Frankel, Ben Smit, and Federico Sturzenegger
[Corresponding policy brief]

Understanding South Africa’s Economic Puzzles
Dani Rodrik

Competition and Productivity Growth in South Africa
Philippe Aghion, Matias Braun, and Johannes Fedderke
[Corresponding policy brief]

Crime, Justice, and Growth in South Africa: Toward a Plausible Contribution from Criminal Justice to Economic Growth
Christopher Stone

Why Has Unemployment Risen in the New South Africa?
Abhijit Banerjee, Sebastian Galiani, Jim Levinsohn, and Ingrid Woolard

South African Trade Policy Matters: Trade Performance & Trade Policy
Lawrence Edwards and Robert Lawrence
[Corresponding policy brief]

Team Members

Ricardo Hausmann

Person

Ricardo Hausmann

Director

Sebastian Galiani

Person

Sebastian Galiani

Former Associate

Head shot of Robert Z. Lawrence

Person

Robert Z. Lawrence

Albert L. Williams Professor of International Trade and Investment, HKS

Head shot of Dani Rodrik

Person

Dani Rodrik

Ford Foundation Professor of International Political Economy, HKS


Additional Team Members

Philippe Aghion

Abhijit Banerjee

Matias Braun

Lawrence Edwards

Johannes Fedderke

Jeffrey Frankel

Bailey Klinger

Jim Levinsohn

Ben Smit

Christopher Stone

Federico Sturzenegger

Ingrid Woolard