Green Growth

Decarbonization will radically transform global production. It presents a defining opportunity for growth by creating new industries, markets, and paths to economic development.

For decarbonization to succeed globally, it should be reframed as a 21st-century update to John F. Kennedy’s appeal: “Ask not what your country can do to reduce its emissions; ask what your country can do to reduce the world’s emissions.”

Jump To

Overview

How Global Decarbonization Is Driving a Durable Opportunity for Economic Growth

The world is rapidly transitioning to a lower-carbon economy. Decarbonization will radically transform global production by creating new industries, markets, and paths for economic development. This energy transition presents a defining opportunity for growth by redefining the comparative advantage of places. Countries and regions must act quickly and adopt a context-specific strategy for green growth: places that act first to carve out their role in a rapidly greening world will come out ahead; others will be left behind.

As investors poured $500 billion into the energy transition last year alone, a new geography of energy is emerging. Fossil fuels such as coal and oil are energy dense and easy to transport. This has made the world ‘flat’ from an energy perspective, so countries with poor energy resources can specialize in energy-intensive production. Germany, Japan, China, and South Korea have therefore become the world’s top exporters of iron and steel.

Read More About Global Decarbonization

But decarbonization implies a move from cheap-to-transport fossil fuels to green sources of energy – sun, wind, hydro, and geothermal – that are unevenly distributed and only transported as far as the nearest electrical grid. The local availability of renewable energy will increasingly drive an economy’s comparative advantage. Places rich in hard-to-transport renewable power have a generational opportunity to produce energy-intensive building blocks of the world’s economy, such as ammonia, steel, aluminum, chemicals, and fuels. Countries that fail to pay attention to these changes may be left with ‘gray’ products that are increasingly shunned by a greening world, making national development more difficult.

Given that many of the world’s large economies are moving rapidly to decarbonize – and taking their financial backing with them – green growth presents a seismic, durable opportunity. Over the past half-century, successful economies have been able to evolve their comparative advantage, for example, by starting in garments before moving into electronics and machinery, shifting their industrial bases to create new jobs and higher incomes. Green Growth is no different: growth strategists must create methods to accrue new capabilities and exploit them to diversify their economies. Sometimes the best development pathways will involve using the green transition to gain new productive capabilities, which countries can then apply more broadly to other sectors of their economies.

As is too often the case with technological change, many places with the most to gain from the energy transition have been the slowest to adopt green growth strategies. Policymakers in these economies face multiple pressing priorities, from social unrest related to youth unemployment to the rising risks of a macro crisis amidst high global inflation. Against these problems, global climate change treaties that ask each country to reduce its carbon emissions seem like a distraction and an unfair one, given that climate change has been driven by advanced economies and will make economic progress harder for others. For countries as large as Turkey, Egypt, or Pakistan, which represent less than 1% of global emissions, achieving net zero emissions would not appreciably solve the world’s climate problem.

This framing misunderstands where the greatest gains are for many developing economies: not in restricting domestic emissions but in helping the world achieve a lower-carbon economy. For decarbonization to succeed globally, it should be reframed as a 21st-century update to John F. Kennedy’s appeal: “Ask not what your country can do to reduce its emissions; ask what your country can do to reduce the world’s emissions.”

Economic policymakers must consider how they can help the world reduce its emissions (and focus not just on their own carbon footprint) by promoting the right ecosystem for green growth. The green agenda may be about preventing a global catastrophe. But if managed well, policymakers have a chance to leverage it into the next great transformation of their economies.

shutterstock_1961087689_copy.jpg

Strategies

The Growth Lab is uniquely positioned to help countries develop green growth strategies. Over almost two decades, we have developed breakthrough insights into the nature of economic growth and applied our foundational research to projects with countries and regions around the world. The core of our approach relies on understanding how countries gain knowledge and productive capabilities and combine them in new ways to diversify their economies and connect with regional and international networks of trade. We aim to help policymakers assess locally appropriate strategies across several dimensions of green growth opportunities:

Explore our Five Strategies
  1. Producing the technologies and inputs for the world to decarbonize. Decarbonization will stimulate huge demand for new energy technologies. Supplying the booming demand for critical minerals, mineral processing, products in the value chains for technologies such as solar panels and batteries, and associated services is a smart green growth strategy. How close are these value chains to your productive capabilities? For key, unproven technologies, uncertainty remains around which technology will win out. Strategies will need to adapt to this shifting demand. 
  2. “From grey to green”—producing energy-intensive activities in a green way. Some energy-intensive activities will need to relocate to places rich in cheap renewable power. Strategies must aim to leverage the relocation of these industries to stimulate growth. Producing these products with green energy will drive new comparative advantage to compete with ‘grey’ versions, may earn a green premium, and will serve markets that require purchasers committed to decarbonization. At the same time, large booms driven by investment into natural resources produce many distortions of a domestic economy. Countries must understand how these distortions play out and manage them in ways that favor inclusiveness, stability, and sustainability. 
  3. Monetizing carbon sinks and carbon storage. Decarbonization will create whole new markets, such as the market for carbon credits. Certain natural landscapes hold enormous untapped value for use as carbon sinks. The challenge to making these landscapes pay is to create an enforceable, trusted carbon asset that can be traded abroad. Accessing high prices for carbon credits is key to monetizing natural landscapes. Elsewhere, carbon storage in geological formations holds the potential to relocate energy-intensive industries, creating dual opportunities for carbon storage and industrial production. 
  4. Creating and exporting the knowhow for decarbonization. Places that lead in developing green industries can also export the knowhow for decarbonization to accelerate projects in other places. This applies to places leading on the research and development of new technologies, to leaders in financing capital investments, creating carbon markets, or developing supply chains for energy technologies. Exporting that knowhow can drive growth at home and help the world decarbonize. 
  5. Applying capabilities gained from decarbonization to diversify into related productive areas. If pursued in the right way, decarbonization will require countries to generate new domestic capabilities that can be applied beyond green industries. Investments in decarbonization can act as a steppingstone to enter new production segments. This applies to using new capabilities learned from producing electrolyzers to enter other advanced manufacturing. Similarly, financing deployment of solar and wind may require countries to create more sophisticated financial markets that they can then apply to other financing challenges.

These approaches require very different capabilities and skillsets. Countries must develop a detailed understanding of their economic structure and map this structure to green growth opportunities to know which strategies they are best able to pursue. Some countries may have the geological profile, and technical expertise to export critical minerals or store captured carbon. Others may be able to manufacture needed products, such as power electronics, or components for electrolyzers and electric vehicles. Still, others may be wondering how to best exploit their renewable resources in their particular economic context. All countries will need to learn about the public goods they need to provide to develop their best opportunities, which often requires creating specific mechanisms that reveal this information. The Growth Lab is uniquely able to help countries approach these challenges.

Research Agenda

The Growth Lab has pioneered methods to understand how economies adopt new technologies to evolve their comparative advantage and achieve greater prosperity. These methods offer unique insights into how to design green growth strategies, leveraging a place’s existing capabilities to take advantage of context-specific opportunities. Core research is required to advance understanding of the nature of green growth opportunities to answer the following questions:

Read More About Our Research Agenda
  • What are the value chains for clean energy technologies? Research will use network spaces to explore the value chains of a portfolio of clean energy technologies, from raw minerals to final assembly. Modelling work will study the viability of different technologies at different cost parameters. 
  • Which places have existing capabilities in clean energy technologies? What role do economies have in these spaces: mineral extraction, manufacturing assembly, or R&D centers? Research will use global trade, business location, and patent data to map the geographic presence, evolution, and co-location of key segments of clean energy technologies. 
  • How does a low-carbon future shift the landscape of demand for goods, energy sources, and technologies? How will clean energy technologies evolve, and which energy systems have the greatest technological risk? Research will map localized opportunities for places to play offense in growth industries where they have a comparative advantage. The research will also focus on strategies to play defense as the world prices out ‘dirty’ inputs, which must be made in green ways. 
  • How can places use their natural resources to diversify their economies? Research will map the potential of a place across clean energy resources and mineral deposits. This research will aim to assess the feasibility of mineral production and consider key institutions for investment in geological assets. The research aims to develop a framework for mineral extraction to build credibility and trust beyond the goal of maximizing the value of extractive rents. 
  • What public goods do countries need to pursue various green growth strategies: electrical grid infrastructure, financial markets, and access to export markets? Given that the sun shines for free and the cost of fixed capital partly determines project viability, this research aims to identify how places can reduce the cost of capital. Decarbonization also relies on massive amounts of R&D to come up with new ways to make products without emitting carbon (such as green steel) and to develop clean energy technologies. Research will study the necessary systems to stimulate R&D to drive innovation and access to technologies to lower emissions.

We aim to use these research findings in our executive education programs to train leaders around the world to pursue green growth effectively, in our applied projects advising countries on growth strategy, and in outreach activities to disseminate knowledge within the international community.

shutterstock_1961087689_copy.jpg

We aim to use our research findings in our executive education programs to train leaders around the world to pursue green growth effectively, in our applied projects advising countries on growth strategy, and in outreach activities to disseminate knowledge within the international community.

Course & Tool

HKS Executive Education is offering a one-week on-campus program, Leading Green Growth: Economic Strategies for a Low-Carbon World. Under the direction of faculty chairs Ricardo Hausmann and Daniel Schrag, participants will gain a foundational understanding of decarbonization and its economic impact. In this video, Profs. Hausmann and Schrag share research insights and provide a preview of the course. 

Growth Lab senior research manager Tim Cheston unveils Greenplexity during his presentation on green growth strategies at COP29 in Baku, Azerbaijan.

At COP29 in Baku, Azerbaijan, the Growth Lab launched Greenplexity, an interactive tool that helps countries identify their localized opportunities for green growth by supplying what the world needs for the global energy transition. The tool provides 10 years of data for ten green value chains: batteries, critical minerals, the electric grid, electric vehicles, green hydrogen, heat pumps, hydroelectric, nuclear, solar, and wind power, and includes strategic outlooks for more than 140 countries.

  • Journal Articles

    Daniotti, S., Hartog, M. & Neffke, F., 2025

    The Coherence of US Cities

    Diversified economies are critical for cities to sustain their growth and development, but they are also costly because diversification often requires expanding a city’s capability base. We analyze how cities […]
    Pictured are a brown and a green African grass frog (Ptychadena nana) in the Southeastern Ethiopian Highlands.

    Diversified economies are critical for cities to sustain their growth and development, but they are also costly because diversification often requires expanding a city’s capability base. We analyze how cities manage this trade-off by measuring the coherence of the economic activities they support, defined as the technological distance between randomly sampled productive units in a city. We use this framework to study how the US urban system developed over almost two centuries, from 1850 to today. To do so, we rely on historical census data, covering over 600M individual records to describe the economic activities of cities between 1850 and 1940, as well as 8 million patent records and detailed occupational and industrial profiles of cities for more recent decades. Despite massive shifts in the economic geography of the United States over this 170-year period, average coherence in its urban system remains unchanged. Moreover, across different time periods, datasets, and relatedness measures, coherence falls with city size at the exact same rate, pointing to constraints to diversification that are governed by a city’s size in universal ways.

  • Working Papers

    Kaddah, F., 2025

    Women at Work: A Systematic Diagnostic of Female Saudi Employment Gains in Saudi Arabia

    Saudi Arabia has witnessed a paradox where high demand for labor did not translate into high labor force participation for Saudi women. Despite possessing higher educational attainment than men, Saudi […]
    Growth Lab

    Saudi Arabia has witnessed a paradox where high demand for labor did not translate into high labor force participation for Saudi women. Despite possessing higher educational attainment than men, Saudi women historically faced lower participation rates, higher unemployment, and concentration in lower-paying sectors. This paper examines the paradoxical surge in Saudi women’s employment during a period of economic weakness following the 2014 oil price shock and 2020 pandemic. The study documents unprecedented employment gains driven primarily by new labor market entrants, particularly women with high school education or less, who diversified beyond traditional education and health sectors into retail, construction, manufacturing, and food services. Through empirical analysis of policy reforms implemented between 2016-2022, the paper identifies three key drivers of Saudi women’s employment gains: the removal of legal and social barriers (including workspace requirements and driving restrictions), wage subsidies during COVID-19, and increases in the Nitaqat de facto minimum wage for Saudi workers. While these gains represent historic progress, the analysis reveals concerning trends, including a widening gender wage gap and questions regarding the sustainability of subsidy-dependent employment growth. The paper highlights the need to balance short-term policy interventions to increase women’s entry into the workforce with long-term diversification efforts that align women’s skills and wage expectations with market demands to ensure sustainable and equitable employment outcomes.

  • Working Papers

    Kalemli-Özcan, S., Soylu, C. & Yildirim, M.A., 2025

    Global Networks, Monetary Policy and Trade

    We develop a novel framework to study the interaction between monetary policy and trade. Our New Keynesian open economy model incorporates international production networks, sectoral heterogeneity in price rigidities, and […]
    Growth Lab

    We develop a novel framework to study the interaction between monetary policy and trade. Our New Keynesian open economy model incorporates international production networks, sectoral heterogeneity in price rigidities, and trade distortions. We decompose the general equilibrium response to trade shocks into distinct channels that account for demand shifts, policy effects, exchange rate adjustments, expectations, price stickiness, and input–output linkages. Tariffs act simultaneously as demand and supply shocks, leading to endogenous fragmentation through changes in trade and production network linkages. We show that the net impact of tariffs on domestic inflation, output, employment, and the dollar depends on the endogenous monetary policy response in both the tariff-imposing and tariff-exposed countries, within a global general equilibrium framework. Our quantitative exercise replicates the observed effects of the 2018 tariffs on the U.S. economy and predicts a 1.6 pp decline in U.S. output, a 0.8 pp rise in inflation, and a 4.8% appreciation of the dollar in response to a retaliatory trade war linked to tariffs announced on “Liberation Day.” Tariff threats, even in the absence of actual implementation, are self-defeating— leading to a 4.1% appreciation of the dollar, 0.6% deflation, and a 0.7 pp decline in output, as agents re-optimize in anticipation of future distortions. Dollar appreciates less or even can depreciate under retaliation, tariff threats, and increased global uncertainty.

    Publisher’s Version

  • Working Papers

    Unkovska, T. & Konoplyov, S., 2025

    Global Imbalances in International Trade, Dynamics of Debt and Finance: Causes and Mitigation Measures

    Global imbalances have been building up in the world economy for decades and have reached critical levels, giving rise to tariff confrontations, trade wars, and geopolitical tensions. This paper presents […]
    Growth Lab

    Global imbalances have been building up in the world economy for decades and have reached critical levels, giving rise to tariff confrontations, trade wars, and geopolitical tensions. This paper presents our systemic analysis of three global imbalances: international trade, debt dynamics, and finance. Based on our new systemic concept of global imbalances and analysis of a large body of historical and latest financial and economic data in various countries and the world economy, we have concluded that these three global imbalances are closely interconnected and mutually influence each other through different channels and nonlinear feedback mechanisms that we describe. These three global imbalances are interrelated symptoms of deep structural problems in the global economy that require corrective measures both at the level of individual countries, especially the US and China, and at the global coordinated efforts by key countries within the G7 and G20. We highlight the key structural problems in the global economy, suggest a modern interpretation of the Triffin dilemma through the prism of equilibrium levels of exchange rates, and suggest possible measures to mitigate the global imbalances. 

  • Working Papers

    Bustos, S., et al., 2025

    Tackling Discrepancies in Trade Data: The Harvard Growth Lab International Trade Datasets

    Bilateral trade data informs foreign and domestic policy decisions, serves as a growth indicator, determines tariffs, and is the basis for financial and investment decisions for corporations. Accurate trade data […]
    Growth Lab

    Bilateral trade data informs foreign and domestic policy decisions, serves as a growth indicator, determines tariffs, and is the basis for financial and investment decisions for corporations. Accurate trade data translates into better decision-making. However, the raw bilateral trade data reported by UN Comtrade suffer from two structural problems: reporting differences between country partners and countries reporting in different product classification systems, which require product-level harmonization to compare data across countries. In this paper, we address these challenges by combining a mirroring technique and a data-driven concordance method. Mirroring reconciles importer and exporter differences by imputing country reliability scores and applying a weighted country-pair average to calculate the estimated trade value. We harmonize product classifications across vintages by calculating conversion weights that reflect a product’s market share. The resulting publicly available datasets mitigate issues in raw trade statistics, reducing reporting inconsistencies while maintaining product-level granularity across six decades. 

  • Working Papers

    Pritchett, L. & Viarengo, M., 2025

    Raising the Bar: A Poverty Line for Global Inclusion

    The first of the Sustainable Development Goals adopted by the United Nations in 2015 is “End poverty in all its forms everywhere,” which implies moving beyond “extreme poverty” to an […]
    Growth Lab

    The first of the Sustainable Development Goals adopted by the United Nations in 2015 is “End poverty in all its forms everywhere,” which implies moving beyond “extreme poverty” to an array of poverty lines. This raises the obvious question: to complement the dollar-a-day (now P$2.15) global lower-bound poverty line, what is the global upper-bound poverty line (GUBPL)? We propose, empirically estimate, and defend a GUBPL based on two criteria. First, the global poverty line is an absolute level of material wellbeing and treats the world’s people and households equally, not relative to birthplace, residence or citizenship. Second, the distinctive property that separates the standard poverty measures (Foster, Greer, Thorbecke 1984) is that gains in household income/consumption above the poverty line count for exactly zero in reducing poverty. Our second criteria is that a GUBPL should be set at a high enough level of income/consumption that zero gains, while not literally true, is a “close enough” approximation. Our two empirical approaches, based on completely different material wellbeing indicators, both suggest a GUBPL in the range of P$19 to P$40 per person per day. This range for a GUBPL is consistent with a variety of considerations, like national poverty lines and achievement of basics and is consistent with the new World Bank “prosperity gap” standard. A GUBPL of P$21.5 has a nice “focal point” appeal as it is exactly ten times the current global lower bound of P$2.15. A poverty line of P$21.5 makes “development as poverty reduction” an inclusive and ambitious global vision, compatible with existing and future development goals.

  • Web Articles

    Tapia, J. & Venturi, L., 2025

    Lessons from Andalusia: How Can Policymakers Promote Economic Growth?

    Amid rapid technological change and heightened competition, Europe must re-ignite economic growth. Evidence from Andalusia – Spain’s poorest region – highlights the need to make full use of a region’s […]
    Growth Lab

    Amid rapid technological change and heightened competition, Europe must re-ignite economic growth. Evidence from Andalusia – Spain’s poorest region – highlights the need to make full use of a region’s productive capabilities to forge new competitive advantages and raise living standards.

  • Web Articles

    Protzer, E., 2025

    Lagging Regions: What Can Policymakers Learn from Wyoming?

    Despite an abundance of valuable raw materials and breathtaking natural beauty, the western US state of Wyoming lags its neighbours in terms of economic performance. This is largely due to […]
    Growth Lab

    Despite an abundance of valuable raw materials and breathtaking natural beauty, the western US state of Wyoming lags its neighbours in terms of economic performance. This is largely due to a lack of substantial urban centres, driven in part by excessively restrictive regulations on housing.

  • Book Chapter

    Ahuja, K. & Hausmann, R., 2025

    Industrial policy for competitiveness in the energy transition

    Green intersections: the global embedding of climate change in policy, 53-74.

    Green objectives have reshaped public policy worldwide since the signing in 2015 of the Paris Agreement to limit global warming. Climate policy has moved from being one policy among many […]

    Green objectives have reshaped public policy worldwide since the signing in 2015 of the Paris Agreement to limit global warming. Climate policy has moved from being one policy among many to an objective embedded in public policies at every level, including energy, industrial, fiscal, trade, development and foreign policies. However, a clear outcome from this policy shift is yet to be seen, with emissions still rising and climate impacts intensifying. There is also backlash against greening in a charged geopolitical environment.

    Nevertheless, the chapters in this volume, written by a range of experts worldwide, show that in many countries and policy areas, green objectives are still driving fundamental changes and many lessons have been learned. The goals of reducing emissions and enhancing economic and societal resilience to climate change will persist as climate impacts become more evident, and as the green transition produces successes at city, regional and national levels. In this context, this Bruegel Blueprint offers a fresh intellectual framework for understanding how the green transition is shaping cross-sectoral impacts across the globe.

  • Journal Articles

    Fortunato, A. & Santos, M.A., 2025

    Public-Private Dialogs to Spur Export-led Growth: The Case of Productivity Taskforces in Namibia

    Cambridge University Press: Elements in the Economics of Emerging Markets

    This case study examines the implementation of Namibia’s first Productivity Task Force focused on the high-value fruit sector from 2021 to 2024. Productivity task forces, modeled after Peru’s Mesas Ejecutivas, […]
    public_private_dialogs_cover.jpg

    This case study examines the implementation of Namibia’s first Productivity Task Force focused on the high-value fruit sector from 2021 to 2024. Productivity task forces, modeled after Peru’s Mesas Ejecutivas, facilitate public-private dialogues to resolve sector-specific productivity issues. The Namibian Investment Promotion and Development Board, the Ministry of Agriculture, Water and Land Reform, and the Ministry of Finance led the Namibian task force. The study highlights critical stages, including the task force’s management and organization, political authorization, and the identification and resolution of productivity problems. While some challenges remain unsolved, the PTF has laid the groundwork for long-term improvements in government capacity, better public-public coordination, public-private collaboration, and a more business-friendly environment. The study offers valuable insights for implementing similar public-private initiatives in other developing countries. This title is also available as Open Access on Cambridge Core.

    ———————————————

    Cambridge Elements are a new concept in academic publishing and scholarly communication, combining the best features of books and journals. They consist of original, concise, authoritative, and peer-reviewed scholarly and scientific research, organised into focused series edited by leading scholars, and provide comprehensive coverage of the key topics in disciplines spanning the arts and sciences.

    Regularly updated and conceived from the start for a digital environment, they provide a dynamic reference resource for graduate students, researchers, and practitioners.

  • Working Papers

    Nedelkoska, L., et al., 2025

    De Facto Openness to Immigration

    Various factors influence why some countries are more open to immigration than others. Policy is only one of them. We design country-specifc measures of openness to immigration that aim to […]
    Growth Lab

    Various factors influence why some countries are more open to immigration than others. Policy is only one of them. We design country-specifc measures of openness to immigration that aim to capture de facto levels of openness to immigration, complementing existing de jure measures of immigration, based on enacted immigration laws and policy measures. We estimate these for 148 countries and three years (2000, 2010, and 2020). For a subset of countries, we also distinguish between openness towards tertiary-educated migrants and less than tertiary-educated migrants. Using the measures, we show that most places in the World today are closed to immigration, and a few regions are very open. The World became more open in the first decade of the millennium, an opening mainly driven by the Western World and the Gulf countries. Moreover, we show that other factors equal, countries that increased their openness to immigration, reduced their old-age dependency ratios, and experienced slower real wage growth, arguably a sign of relaxing labor and skill shortages.

    Explore the country rankings in our interactive visualization website and learn more about the project, Leveraging the Global Talent Pool to Jumpstart Prosperity in Emerging Economies.

  • Working Papers

    Arcay, G. & O’Brien, T., 2025

    Serving From Hermosillo: Opportunities in Cross-Border Trade of Services

    Technological advances have increased the general tradability of services, leading international trade in services to outpace trade in goods, especially after the global financial crisis and the COVID-19 pandemic. Services […]
    Growth Lab

    Technological advances have increased the general tradability of services, leading international trade in services to outpace trade in goods, especially after the global financial crisis and the COVID-19 pandemic. Services once considered less tradable due to the necessity of physical proximity between consumer and provider are now increasingly digitized and delivered remotely. Cross-border services now represent 79% of all internationally traded services, and digitally deliverable activities like engineering, accounting, database and other information services are experiencing yearly U.S. imports growth rates over 15%. This report analyzes how Mexico has been capitalizing on some of these trends over the past five years using the most granular data available. Then, we analyze opportunities from the perspective of Hermosillo. 

    Hermosillo is poised to benefit from this global expansion due to its comparative advantages and existing productive capabilities in potentially tradeable services. We estimate the revealed comparative advantage of Hermosillo in each tradeable service category and find that the city is better positioned than similarly rich and complex cities in Mexico to take advantage of several of these opportunities. This is because Hermosillo is currently intensive in these opportunities, and also because Hermosillo has other industries that are similar to the opportunities in terms of their occupational structure (which could potentially supply additional labor in case tradeable service industries were to expand rapidly). Moreover, Hermosillo’s wage differentials compared to the U.S. are significant for most industries and occupations, including all tradable service industries and teleworkable occupations. This provides a cost advantage for foreign firms seeking to outsource part of their operations. Hermosillo also boasts a well-educated workforce with high levels of schooling and a strong emphasis on STEM fields, positioning it well to meet a potential expansion in educated labor demand. 

    Some tradable services represent bigger opportunities for Hermosillo, but the city will need to develop new capabilities in cross-border service provision in order to take advantage of them. In particular, engineering services, database and other information services, business and management consulting, research and development, education, and accounting services require attention and further research to inform effective strategies. To realize these opportunities, local firms may need to overcome sector-specific challenges related to internationalization. Policymakers can play a pivotal role by fostering strategic partnerships, attracting multinational service providers to bring in knowhow, and creating supportive enabling environments for teleworking and digital service provision.

See All

Economic Prosperity in the Amazon Rainforest

Is there a tradeoff between environmental sustainability and economic development? Growth Lab researchers tackled this question and others in the Peruvian and Colombian Amazon. 

Support Our Mission

We’re actively recruiting research fellows and postdoctoral fellows.